topdog

Nice one , well done

Well Done Mate

Cheers buddy

Congrtats Nice Result

Nice one Patch Well done

Hi trans am The DFI boards latest BIOS 10/8/2009 does not recognized this cpu and there's nothing I can do about it. The compare link clearly shows it as one core and so does the screenshot. It's the same with the 140 I have http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/950850_topdog_wprime_32m_sempron_140_31sec_343ms Same for turrican http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/928441_turrican_wprime_32m_sempron_140_43sec_550ms Same for redhat http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/997751_redhat_ownage_reference_clock_lanparty_dk_790fxb_m2rsh_450_mhz Same for Wizerty http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1080813_wizerty_cpu_z_sempron_140_5738.05_mhz All on the same board Hope you understand

Thank you , it is a very frustrating benchmark to get right

Nice going mate

Same here, it hangs on gaming 1. How do I get round this

ok thanks

Does this mean that we dont need the mainboard tab from previous benchmarks to enter this competition ?

Nice work mate, well done

Nice one mate

Please read the rules here http://www.hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/pcmark_2005/rules It says that xp startup cannot exceed 220MB/s Please also remove all your recent results too as they are all over 220 many thanks

XP startup way over 220mb/s please remove

Nice score mate, sort that tansparent windows and you will have no no 1

Thanks

Nice score, well done mate

Thanks Jabski, I'll have to try this chip with another board

Nice one, so close to 400k, I like the pic but he needs a bigger hammer !!!

I think these should be removed http://hwbot.org/community/submission/935930_packet_cpu_z_core_i7_920_5328.64_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/870841_ocgmj_cpu_z_core_i7_920_5288.18_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/944317_expander_cpu_z_core_i7_920_5110_mhz

I've Just installed this Massman, this is just awesome with all the links instantly available in the toolbar, I can see me using this a lot. Thanks

Although I did report these four days ago, they are still there http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977684_be_ben_pcmark_vantage_core_2_e8400_3.0ghz_14532_marks should be in 3DMark Vantage http://hwbot.org/community/submission/977742_tor_za_pcmark_vantage_phenom_ii_x2_555_be_12920_marks should be in 4 core category CPUZ shows unlocked to 4 cores (X4 B55)

Wrong category, it should be in 3DMark Vantage,

This should be deleted, great score though ;-)