Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Stermy57

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    682

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Stermy57

    Rage 128GL Aquamark

    in Submission & member moderation

    Rage 128Pro vs Rage 128 Ultra

    in General hardware discussion

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    now i have do again benchs with my sapphire to increase my records but i have to put it onto rage 128 pro category or ultra?

    Ati rage128pro "ultra" is nothing other than an oem model of the rage128pro. it uses the same rage128pro chip and same pci dev code but a different subsys code, which is not in the subsys list of ati's driver. so you just need to delete the subsys code of "generic rage128pro" line in the inf file, so it would work with all cards under the dev code family.

    and the ultra clocks a bit differently:

    "standard" rage128pro (maybe called xpert128pro): 120/120

    high-end version with active cooling fan(probably called rage fury pro): rumored to be 143/143, very rare.

    rage fury maxx: dual cores at 125/143

    rage128pro ultra: mine reports 133/133 but some others report 118/140 or like my Sapphire 130/130

    Rage 128Pro vs Rage 128 Ultra

    in General hardware discussion

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    Hello i decided to open again another thread about Rage 128 cards because I put my scores with my Sapphire Rage 128 Ultra 4X on this category:

    http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocards#key=rage_128_ultra

     

    I talk about this situation just hier:

    http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=46054

     

    But same weeks ago my scores were put on Rage 128 Pro category O.o

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2280347_stermy57_aquamark_rage_128_pro_2382_marks

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2280355_stermy57_3dmark_99_max_rage_128_pro_5086_marks

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2280353_stermy57_3dmark2000_rage_128_pro_2790_marks

    http://hwbot.org/submission/2280352_stermy57_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_1672_marks

     

    It's strange... it's an hwbot's bug an error or did you decided to put these score in 128pro category?

    Aquamark3 Wrapper V2 BUG Thread

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted

    OK, please give it a try with beta of 2.54 and send me the log.txt created in installation folder after it crashes.

     

    Realtime is usually a bad choice for any application, especially GUI based ones. You should only use it for CLI applications that do all their work without any 3rd parties, and explorer.exe killed.

     

    The log.txt file show me this:

    [2013-12-22T11:43:31] background set

    [same date] Ideal thread count: 1

    [same date] settings read and applied

    [same date] systeminfo is enabled

    [same date] dxdiag launched: 1

     

    Sorry i wrote the log.txt file because i write this Message with My Nokia 520 .

    With it i can't post any photos :/

    Aquamark3 Wrapper V2 BUG Thread

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    I find the solution for the second problem :)

    If you try to run it on realtime mod you can't use the "manual mod".

     

    You can run aquamark's wrapper on realtime mod only on default settings.

    But i have found another bug....

    When the bench was finished the wrapper crash on Manual mod

    Changelog

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted

    You can not run it on Win98SE. This is due both Qt Framework and OpenSSL 3rd-parties. I'm not sure about W2K.

     

    For cards that can't be run on W2K/XP, run it without wrapper and save a normal screenshot with cpu-z/gpu-z windows. I will see what can be done to upload those.

     

    Uhm understand...

    I Will test it on w2k on the weekend!

    So which Version i can use with old cards?

    Thanks For support :)

    Changelog

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    The application has absolutely NO connection with .NET environment, it was done with Qt Framework for exactly this reason.

     

    Uhmmm it's so strange.... Because without net Framework it doesn't work on My system....

    I try later to run it on a new Windows installation and on win98se or Windows 2000 sp4 :)

    Thanks For this information... This means that i can finally run with old agp\pci cards with win98se (like rage pro 8mb) :D

    Aquamark3 Wrapper V2 BUG Thread

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted

    Hi Stermy.

     

    For you first problem, help me get info on why the SystemInfo crashes:

    open a cmd window in the installation folder and run following commands:

    1. dmid.dll >> dmi.txt

    2. gpuz.dll -dump gpuz.txt

    3. dxdiag /t C:\dxdiag.txt

     

    Send me the files on facebook or email.

     

    As for 800x600, try running in MANUAL mode.

     

    Hi genieben :) For the first bug no problem i do it later :)

    For the second problem i run it on Manual mod, aquamark start but when it show me the aquamark's menu i can't use any command :(

    The Keyboard and mouse doesn't work, i must restart My system.

    It's so strange... My notebook work but i can't do anything

    Aquamark3 Wrapper V2 BUG Thread

    in HWBOT Aquamark³ Wrapper

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    Hello genieben there is a bug with the last version of aquamark on my Acer travelmate 2312lm with sis m661mx chipset.

    When i lunch it, Windows report an error and aquamark crash.

    I try different solutions and finally i find a register file to lunch your aquamark luncher gui without any system info. :)

    I was happy but when finally i lunch the bench the screen became black and few seconds later it return me on desktop.

    So the bench doesn't start...

    My notebook have Celeron m360@default with sia m661mx igpu, winXp sp3 with no mods.

     

    edit: i think that the problem is a bug of the gui because the file "log.txt" says:" no valid benchmark configuration found"

    And on gfx information on resolution the log show 800x600 and not 1024x768 like default setting...

×
×
  • Create New...