-
Posts
682 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Stermy57
-
-
Just use the search field:
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/330_/
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mirage/
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mirage_3/
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/voodoo5_5500/
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/voodoo3_3000/
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/voodoo2/
And you will find them all, I posted some exemples here
I understand Christian Ney, thanks
-
those brands are already there, but not shown in the overview.
So is not possible to put a score?
-
Hello,
I saw that in HW Bot list there are only AMD/ATI/NVIDIA and Intel GPU, but exists other brands, for example:
Matrox
SIS
3Dfx
And so on, so it's possible to put these brands on HW Bot list?
-
-
Mitica la 9700PRO!!!!
Perachè hai fatto i tests a default?
-
Più che soffiarla qui si vede ancora più come la CPU mi limiti...
-
-
i added them.
Thanks Turrican
-
You must upload your picture one by one...
-
Ticket ID: 1498
Priority: Low
Hello HWBot,\r\nI saw that this model motherboard does not exist in HW Bot list...\r\nI buy it but now i can\'t put my score with its\r\nSo it\'s possible to add the GIGABYTE GA-970A-UD3?\r\nIn the same also:\r\nGIGABYTE GA-970-D3\r\nGIGABYTE GA-970-DS3
-
The best would be if you add a ticket to the helpcenter here: http://hwbot.org/forum/helpcenter.php
Thanks
-
Hello, i saw that this model motherboard does not exist in HW Bot list...
I buy it but now i can't put my score with its
So it's possible to add the GIGABYTE GA-970A-UD3?
In the same also:
GIGABYTE GA-970-D3
GIGABYTE GA-970-DS3
-
Thanks Turrican i used the TNT2 M64 16MB with the Detonator 30.82 and 3Dmark 2001 runs well
Any news?
-
-
today i try to use a pci ide card bootable ... i have broken 5 HD at 50mhz pci...
Se fossimo stati vicini avremmo fatto a metà con i Quantum
-
Without words....
500 hours....
-
Yes, i know that now i have to use the new Aquamark wrapper, and yes for "old" i mean (before 26th december 2011)
-
i don't like the situation as well, i hope we can do something here soon.
try older drivers.
Thanks Turrican
Because you are the only one that want to help me
-
May I ask you a questions?
I tried to bench with 3DMark 2001SE and this GPU but i have the error:
"OUTOFVIDEOMEMORY"
Can ask you, what do you have done?
-
dude those results you linked were done before the new aquamark wrapper was released and mandatory. just look at the submission date.
now they have no chance to upload old results, because you need the result file.
I Know those scores were old, but is not justification...
Is not correct, because now it's impossible to scores under Aquamark 3 and old AGP cards
So, to conclude I and other people can't put our score?
try another driver regarding the "outofvideomemory" problem. 16mb cards run for sure with the right driver, but for cards with 8mb or less the chances are bad.I have this problem with the Ati Rage PRO and one TNT2 M64 16MB,
Do you know what kind of driver is necessary?
For the ATI Rage I used the last driver from the AMD site...
For the Nvidia I used the Omega 61.77
-
Hello,
I am Stermy57, like my nickname (lol ndr)
I love retrobench and retroclocking with old CPU and GPU,
but i have a problems with olds AGP cards with 3DMark 2001SE and Aquamark 3....
With the new rules it's impossible to make a score with old AGP Card (4/8/16MB) under Aquamark 3 like the ATI Rage PRO 8MB.
Because under WinXP Aquamark 3 crashed at frame 5050...
So I think to run it win Win98 like other peole:
http://hwbot.org/submission/1093350_northwood_3400_aquamark_rage_pro_328_marksbut
http://hwbot.org/submission/2122575_drswizz_aquamark_rage_pro_114_marks
http://hwbot.org/submission/2163180_christian_ney_aquamark_rage_pro_496_marks
But with the new rules the new version of Aquamark required NET framework 4.0
So it's impossible to bench and to put my score under Win98
So is necessary a new rule for the OLD card....
Is not true says that anyone bench under Win98 with Aquamark because Dr.Swizz and Northwood-3400 do it, but they do it with the old rules....
anymore can help me?
I have a problem in the same time with 3Dmark 2001SE with AGP OLD Cards 8/16MB because the software says:
"VIDEOOUTOFMEMORY"
-
Is not true says that anymore bench under Win98 with Aquamark because Dr.Swizz and Northwood-3400 do it, but they do it with the old rules....
-
Yes but with WinXP Aquamrk3 and 3DMark 2001 crash....
3DMark 2001 SE says "OUTOFVIDEOMEMORY"
While Aquamark 3 crash to frame 5050....
-
I tried to bench but it's impossible, someone can help me?
Difference between ATI Rage 128 PRO
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
Hello, i posted my scores with my Sapphire Rage 128 Pro Ultra
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark_99_max/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark2000/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark2001_se/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/aquamark/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
and I saw that in the HWBot list are 2 ranks:
"ATI Rage 128 PRO" and "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP 4X"
So I put my scores with my Sapphire Rage 128 Pro AGP 4X on "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP 4X" but than i saw the score with the "ATI Rage 128 PRO" and also hier there are ATI Rage 128 PRO with AGP4X slots -.-
So what is the difference between "ATI Rage 128 PRO" and "ATI RAGE 128 PRO AGP 4X"?
I was wrong to put my score on "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP4X?
I must put my scores on "ATI Rage 128 PRO" without AGP 4X?
Because now thw 2 ranks:
ATI Rage 128 Pro and ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP4X
are the same :sisi: