-
Posts
682 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Stermy57
-
-
Hi guys may you add these two old mainboard on our HWBot database?
Soltek SL-67EV-V1
TMC TI6NB Rev 2.20
There are two different type of this main one with rev 1.6 and another one with rev 2.20
The first is not able to support pentium III like Coppermine or deutsches, the second one, that i have, supports Celeron, Pentium II and Pentium III
Thanks
See you soon
-
-
This is my 99.9% @Gradus @Terraraptor
I'am ablee to reach 1:33:5xx
This is the video
-
I know what do you mean barbonenet searching and trying an incredible amount of driver for days...
For example I spending my last weeks to find the best driver with an nVidia IGP from forceware 16x.xx to 2xx.xx
anyway I think that you are strong enough to reach better score even if somebody will use the same driver version
-
Grazie ragazzi!
Meiyo troppo buono.
Posso fare ancor meglio ma purtroppo il phenom II X4 965 si é degradato non riesco più a salire come un tempo ne sto cercando un altro altrimenti potrei fare meglio
-
1.33.845 good! I don't know my limit but this time I will use all my tweaks.
My 733 is stable at 210mhz on PI 1MB at 2.2v. I think that it will able to reach 220mhz at 2.4v anyway I have found some days ago one 733 cD0
-
/you turn, Stermy. Show us another 10% - I found out a bug with my tusl thanks to your result and me trying to beat you and GraduS)))
Only now I see you score!
I will try to beat
I need more time I have to reinstall XP and more
See you soon
-
Awesome setup and incredible result
-
LOL, I loose 1 second - something is wrong with me or I better go spleep and recheck tomorrow. Nice scores Stermy and GraduS)
I'm sure that you will do better tomorrow
Ye, finaly.)You are very strong Gradus
This is the first time that I was obligated to use 90% of my tweaks!
It was hard to reach your score, they are equal
Like my friend Griff said some weeks ago competition is important to improve our skills.
Now I know that you are a little bit irritated about gigioracing decision but he don't represent all italian's overclocker
I don't like to fight with no one but i hope that you don't really think what you have wrote about Italian teams
-
Sorry for the last time.
I'm apologize but I don't like when people go around Hwbot forum to write everywhere fake, cheat even different thread ( not hier with any reason)
next time think, and try all you can.
Os, driver and so on
We are all the same hier there is no gods we are humans
Sometimes we make errors but the most aim is understand
-
I will try Quake 3 Arena Demo
Anyway it used same PCB of TNT2 M64 16MB but it has only 8MB.
I am not able to run 3DMark01
-
Now we can probably agree on:
1) both your and havli videos show about the same results
havli -
- 140.9 / 105.6 fpsStermy57 -
- 139.2 / 110.8 fps2) given that your card is better (have higher default clocks of 130/130MHz = mine: 118/140MHz, havli: 118/140MHz) it is not very surprising to see, that your results are slightly better in game 2 test (I say 5 fps), while the first test is about the same (or under the measuring error).
I'm agree with you
Only one thing 3DMark99 is a CPU test, havli used one Pentium 4 3.06 so even if my rage 128pro is working at 130-130 vs 118-140 (havli), it has a little bit more power.
So we all can agree now (yes, I failed to present my Win98 tests at default clock, because I have troubles booting the ASRock 775Dual-VSTA into Win98 install, believe it or not... even the machine is very stable at 225x17 P4 for dual core, 227x17 for single core tasks including SuperPi 32M), it refuse too boot even from Win98 floppy and about 1 000 other DOS booting CD's I tried, so the install will be a challenge) that 254.8/185.2fps on default clock is impossible, as I say right in the beginning, yes?I believe it, do you used a Sata drive?
I don't like Intel chipset like (865 and higher) with win98
Like I wrote some weeks ago, if I were you, I would change platform
I'm very sorry your mainboard is going to die. I did not fully understand what are you saing about the baseclock (you have to back with your overclocking?), but as long at it works, it is likely that I can be repaired by replacing the caps on it, so maybe I can do it for the sake or argument and thoroughness.Caps are good and some of them replaced some months ago.
The problem is controller memory
http://hwbot.org/submission/2248070_drswizz_3dmark_99_max_rage_128_pro_21447_marks
Since unlike you say in the video that "there is nothing more to say" - I do believe that there IS something to be sayed:
1 - default clocks cannot give the score (okay, he could forget to type the clock, that happens... still, he should correct that)
2 - your score of 162/125.4fps is withing the reachable possibility when seriously overclocking the card (177/190MHz) and CPU (157.5x20), so it is okay
Still, 224.8fps is out of the reach of possibility even with very high overclocking, hence my suspicion is at least partly valid
You can believe or not but I think that drswizz's score is regular
I have a biostar 939 with AGP port
I will try them, in my opinion an Athlon 64 or Opteron@2.8-3.0 will give you an incredible boost
-
Only for you Trodas
- 1
-
-
This afternoon I will send you the picture but my M64 8MB is made by ASUS and it look like other ASUS V3800@16MB
-
We have done 3DMark 01 with Socket 370
-
Ok i will use it
-
No rivatuner?
-
I have one TNT2 M64 8MB
If you want, i Will send you a picture
-
Link dosent work. But you think if you beat my old result from 2009 its cool or what?
http://img.hwbot.org/u40311/image_id_880574.jpeg
No answer for the second sentence, I'm not a child like you
Im not intresting in that, chatting here and other. im intresing in competition and absolut results. go make normal results, thats all. i love battles, not texting. only results show who are you in overclocking. its intresting and need brain.U can make max sdram valid, fsb, good 1m results.
You don't like texting? ahahhahah man, you are incredible!
Yesterday you wrote this with no sense and without any reason:
When Italy overclockers show us normal results on s370?u can do it and not waiting winter.Now in italy (in the south, Campania) we have 25-30°
you live in Russia...
And stop spamming about air, make ss, go buy ln2. its not difficult.I'm 20 years old, I'm a student i don't have a lot of money ( my family is poor ) so is not easy to find ln2 or something like this
Now stop poor terra
Even on your score
Good score man!
-
omg, im not talking about $hit one category result. about normal results, best on socket370 1m?cpu-z or sdram.
and what 800EB wr ypu talring about? this score without aimonda?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2665876_stermy57_superpi___1m_pentium_3_800mhz_eb_s370_1min_26sec_735ms
and what memory is it?
My main is efficent, not wr, i don't have any possibility on air cooling
It was made with qimonda
this was made with mosel vitelic
and you:
http://hwbot.org/submission/910412_gradus_superpi___1m_pentium_3_800mhz_eb_s370_1min_31sec_290ms
Gradus you are prig and arrogant
-
what wr you have?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2335345_stermy57_superpi___1m_pentium_3_500mhz_s370_1min_45sec_251ms
this is very old 2012 without a lot of tweaks
And even with my Pentium 3 800EB i made wr without qimonda you talk to much gradus
Lol, it looks like my results are attracting comments in s370))It's true
-
All of you have qimonda. And no one make result with it.
We have done wr scores even before qimonda chips scores
So if you want to see our efficient you can see them even now
-
Keep calm
We need cold time
two old slot1 mainboard
in Support
Posted
Thanks so much Strunkenbold