Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Stermy57

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    682

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Stermy57

    [WTB] AMD K6 III 550

    in Sold

    Posted

    Hi trodas I don't have any AMD K6-III+ 550-500mhz to sell you I only want to give you an advice.

    I spent more than 2 years to find a good AMD K6-III 400Mhz that is stable on air with prime95 at 120x5=600mhz, and only for bench at 124x5=620mhz.

    I think that is impossible to find an AMD K6-III 500-550mhz they are rare too rare.

    AMD produced only few samples and only few mainboard can work with them.

    In general all AMD K6-III 400mhz are able to reach 600mhz and more so if I were you, I would buy one of them.

    Even AMD K6-2+ 550mhz are good! They can reach 700mhz on air easily and 128kb cache l2 on board are enough ;)

    havli - Voodoo5 5500 @ 186/186MHz - 3557 marks 3DMark2001 SE

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    More than ~3500 should be possible with V5 PCI and right MB/OS/driver combination. Not easy to put all four together and score that high though. Thats why i went the easy way, at least for start.

     

    I like plexi cases very much, but they were (maybe still are) almost impossible to buy. So I decided to build my own. Very time consuming... which wasn't an issue for me back in 2008. Wish I had so much free time now. :)

    Detailed specs and more photos here: http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=41337&p=388533#p388533

     

    I would like to buy my first voodoo 5 but I have to find with a good price :)

    I'm only 23 years old, I'm a student I have to pay myself computer parts

    Some weeks ago I have seen one 3DFX voodoo 5 5500 PCI boxed... Over 150$ too much but very rare.

    Your case is superb I love plexi cases and hardware parts are incredible good condition there are the best for a Voodoo 5!

    I have an account to vogons forum I want to know more information about your case project :)

    ATI Rage 128 Pro doubtfull results

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    Stermy57

    No offense taken. Just explain me, how stock ATI Rage 128 PRO get to 255fps in 800x600x16, when there is no test or game ever recorded in history that can prove this.

    Best was max 92fps in Descent... so, how that can be?

     

    In same test, 6800 GT does 500fps. So in essence you are telling me, that ATI Rage 128 PRO can on stock do half the vectoring and texturing power of 6800 GT?

     

    Come on :D

    First point DrSwizz has done 255fps in game 1, I will try do reach it but i don't know if i will succeed.

    You said that you have experience ( i'm not the best i'm an overclockers like others, i have no power to say to anyone if they are good or not, i look only my business) but you have to be more lowly and like i said before there is a big difference between "gaming/review articles" and "overclocking world" you can't compare them.

     

     

    I view benchmarks as means to evaluate and compare computers speed. Not as tweakable programs, that can be tweaked to get better results w/o any reall hardware improvement.

     

    Perhaps that is where we differ?

    You are too know-all this is the problem, you are writing everywere around hwbot forum about "cheaters" but before talking about this why you don't think that maybe you have to improve your skills?

     

     

    I'm calm, unlike the cause where my best efforts on lowest Aquamark score ever is ruited because of wrapper bugs, this thread does not angers me. It makes me laugh ;)

    255fps, ATI Rage 128 PRO - LOL :D

    I don't think your are calm in fact you are writing everywere around hwbot forum about "cheaters" even when nobody have asked to you something

     

     

    I have enought experience with hardware, starting back in 1990. Amiga 500 since summer 1991, etc.

    And you want to tell me, what I can or cannot write? Get a grip of reality, mate :D If I see something wrong, I will say it.

    You have written words that i have never wrote, i only say that your questions seams to be that you haven't enough experience.

     

     

    So the point is to find a bugged driver that show impossible fps? And you call this benchmarking? Is this why none of the questionable scores show a GPU-Z screen at all?

    You are inceredible man... you said before that you have experience since 1990 but if you are a good overclocker like you wrote, you don't have to ask this question because GPU-Z doesn't run on Windows 98 so i used Rivatuner (but only in this situation) that can be used, read HWBot rules!

    http://hwbot.org/news/4243_application_27_rules/

     

     

     

    Don't you think that Core 2 Duo 3.4GHz X6800 can overcome the effectivity problems in the driver?

    If you are a good overclocker like you wrote, you don't have to ask

    in your opinion driver problems can be solved by a simple cpu power?

    an old AMD advertising said: Power is nothing without control

    So...

     

     

    But sure you can tell me all about it :D Or you cannot?

    To you? I don't think so

     

     

    Well, since your "argument" is that my scores does not count, because I'm not experienced enought, then I took reviews from the most experienced peoples around the world and quess what!

    No-one cross even 100fps - and that is for 640x480x16 ! :celebration:

    I have never wrote that your score doesn't count because you have enough experience but the problem is that you have to be more humility but you prefer to write that we are cheaters...

     

     

     

    ...aaah, here we go again. Tualating is more that enought to saturate the Rage card, my friend ;) But once again, I too much stronger CPU into the game and the difference was - non.

    Therefore you are wrong and I'm right.

    Even in this sentence you looks like that you have to study a lot.

    Overclocking is different! if you to use an ATI Rage 128 Pro for retrogaming world a Tualatin platform will be enough but during benchmarks you will need more power

     

     

     

     

    ...witch is why you made your score on Win2k :D :D :D :D :D

    http://img.hwbot.org/u40311/image_id_1111447.jpeg

    I used Win98

     

     

     

    Yea, sure. Nail that 40 to 255fps difference to just a "different driver" that - luckily for you - I cannot obtain. Brilliant! :D

    I bet that if you give me PM with link to driver you used, the difference will be under 5fps in the result. Care to try?

    There is no written rule so i don't want to share to you this information.

    I have never written that with my incredible driver you reach incredible fps!

    To do a good score is important to use a good OS realese, OS tweaking, register tweaks, good mainboard driver and good GPU driver.

    If you add all these points; you will have a good score

    I fight even for 1fps during my bench!

    ATI Rage 128 Pro doubtfull results

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    How about this?

     

     

    Pentium 4 3.06 GHz

    Rage 128 Pro 32MB

    512 MB DDR

    Asus P4S333

    Windows 98 SE + some random Ati drivers

     

    Clearly all textures are in place, so no bugged run. I can run 3DMark like this all day and it will always score +/- 12k at default clocks. Is this proof good enough?

     

    Nice one havli :)

    I hope that is good enough

    I will do it even with my system

    ATI Rage 128 Pro doubtfull results

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    Trodas sorry but I'm lazy and now i have to go to Naples later maybe tomorrow I will reply all your question.

    You have to wait for the video because I'm using only air cooling system and these days are too hot!

     

    Anyway even this http://hwbot.org/submission/2489480_stermy57_3dmark2001_se_rage_128_pro_2413_marks

    and this http://hwbot.org/submission/2496045_stermy57_3dmark2000_rage_128_pro_3640_marks

    Are cheated?

    If I were you, I would think that maybe you have done bad scores (you reached 1400 points only because I said to you to try win2000)

    I will not tell you my informations about rage driver efficient because you are going on Hwbot writing everywhere that 3 cheaters can do what they want

    http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=142426

    http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=141740&page=2

     

    Keep calm man

    ATI Rage 128 Pro doubtfull results

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    Trodas sorry but now it's too much no offense but

    First point:

    When I went to overclock and benchmarks world I studied a lot.

    I read a lot about platforms history and architecture only to understand problems or issues

    So, if I were you, I would be more calm

    You don't have experience and you can't write in this way

    You have to study a lot, in my free time I spend a lot of time to find driver, information from overclockers that have more experience than me.

     

    Second point:

    Do you know anything about efficient problems of ATI Rage driver?

    I think no... The Rage MAXX was an experiment! It's a great card but it have a lot of performance problem. It was the first dual gpu on the same pcb.

    You can't compare old review with this situation

    Because they used old platform like ( early 462 thunderbird] or 370 [coppermine tualatin] or sometimes even slot 1-A

    Anyway there is a big difference between "overclockers world" and "gaming articles"

     

    Third point:

    3DMark99 and 2000 need a good OS (Win98) and is not easy to find the right settings

    At the end is very hard to find a good driver version for Rage series

    I'm sure that you have downloaded the last driver from AMD sure right?

    You have to search better! Some older version... The problem is that some ftp server are down

     

    Well if this is not sufficient, I can do a video I have no problem! ;)

    It's a good choice for me to try to take the first place because this time I will run it with an Athlon 64 4000+@3.6 Orleans and my AsRock AM2NF3-VSTA ( I hope to find the best win98's nForce driver)

    See you soon

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    My fifty cents - why then posting results stating cold on mems (gigio's 1.266S) and 4v (some results with CUmine) when these chips go that high with stock cooling (no sinks) and volts? Isn't that an idication of giving a wrong direction?

     

    Hi terra ;) he really run it with 4.0v you can believe or not but it's true...

    This was not made to giving a wrong direction

    Than he decided to keep secret all information about SDRAM but this was his decision!

    Now we are waiting for cold period ( winter and autumn) than we will see...

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    u can talk abut russian team, dont like them. russian team kill overckloking in russia.

    and i dont like italian team after all.

     

    i talk this way bcz i hate lying.

     

    I have no problem to any country...

    From now I have a problem with you because you are aggressive and like I said before haughty and disrespectful

     

    You don't like Italian teams this is your problem!

    But you don't have any power to talk in this way

    You are a clockers like us!

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    normal, its not lying. gigio think he can have gold medals only with the help of normal mem. thats why he dont give us information, he knows that we broke results easy. thats why this results nabs, only thx to mem. No performanse per clock, no tweaking, nothing...only mem.

    Normal? All can read your words

    Sorry but you are too haughty and disrespectful

     

    u can talk abut russian team, dont like them. russian team kill overckloking in russia.

    and i dont like italian team after all.

     

    I have never wrote anything about Russian team hier

    You start talking about Italian teams

    I think this is the last post

    You have lost my respect

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    I told u facts. Why u so angru to facts? He want lying? ok. Its normal for u? and italian team? ok.

    Normal for u, not normal for others.

     

    Before:

    Raptor bcz now he can beat nabs italian results.

     

    Your words... what do you mean "nabs"?

    Is normal for you to talk with this words?

    Everybody can see that you start talking in aggressive way

    Stop talking about Italian teams nobody talks about Russian team

    Ask to you a question why I'm talking in this way

     

    And this thread not about results from u, nobody intresting in them.

     

    Now when i said that can share info about this meme all of u said - no secret, I used this and this. bcz no sense to hide information.

     

    Before:

    U used this photos bcz italian team dont wont share info, u think its help u in bench and medals here.

     

    But if u have good mem its not the same that u good overclocker. Give that system to me and i make better result, thats all about overckloking.

    Hwbot about medals, but medals its nothing. Hwbot not overclocking, many ppl go away and lost interest.

     

    Your words...

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted

    not true. pos more money and time, after old memory i want to go search in new...and i buy so many diff chips new memory.

     

    anyway gigio fail all his lying to us(no indificator on chips, gives wrong links to mans and other). he can say, mans i dont want share info, thats all. We understand that....but when italian mans post this s**t to us...man, its hahha....

     

    There is a written rule that say that he have to say this information?

    No, so he can do what he want...

    Nobody ask me what kind of memory I have used

    You talk to much but what have you shared to community?

    To Hwbot we can find a lot of your posts that says"

    "what chip and brand are you used?"

    If you want I can link you

    You are "rosicone" go to google translate ;)

     

    Other question I have a lot medals and cup not only with socket 370 only at air cooling ;)

     

    For photos question you talk like a chicken with no sense

    I have done other photos with new Kingston qimonda when I made pcmark04 scores, and this because I used a geforce 6600gt so I was obligated to do again other photo (boring for me)

    ATI Rage 128 Pro doubtfull results

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    No offence... but as I said - you need to learn much about effective benchmarking. You really thing vsync = 15 / 30 / 60 fps? And that vsync checkbox off in ATi CP = 100% sure disabled vsync? This is real world, things doesn't always work as expected here.

     

    Christian Ney:

    Well I'm sure I didn't take advantage of that "tweak". 10k+ score on Rage 128 Pro is easy to get and no questionable methods are required for it. For example http://hw-museum.cz/benchmark-2-2.php - I did this back in 2009... before I even registered on HWBOT, no overclocking, no tweaks, and still 12k score on a 128 Pro.

     

    These situation are common today

    No offence trodas but old school ( fortunately) is not like modern platform ( set voltage change multi and go to xtu)

    Like havli said before ATI Rage driver are terrible...

    Not all settings does always work as expected

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    U used this photos bcz italian team dont wont share info, u think its help u in bench and medals here.

     

    But if u have good mem its not the same that u good overclocker. Give that system to me and i make better result, thats all about overckloking.

    Hwbot about medals, but medals its nothing. Hwbot not overclocking, many ppl go away and lost interest.

     

    Ahahahah man

    Are you envious of a clocker who use only air cooling with no name that can beat you?

    Our scores talk for us!

    Now everyone can read your words...

    TerraRaptor - Pentium 3 800Mhz EB s370 @ 1314MHz - 1min 24sec 31ms SuperPi - 1M

    in Result Discussions

    Posted · Edited by Stermy57

    When i serch normal mem i spend tons of money. Then Gigio post his results we all ask him for mem, but he give as not correct info special. He always know what chip he use, and he dont give us information. Then i found same mem as he, thx to his fotos....now ppl like STERMY57 make rig fotos with diff mem, and then put normal mem for bench...dat very haha. http://hwbot.org/submission/2665876_stermy57_superpi___1m_pentium_3_800mhz_eb_s370_1min_26sec_735ms

    Now i dont give any information to Italian team aboyt s370. I give info about mem to Raptor bcz now he can beat nabs italian results. I think i can give info in pm to normak mens, but not Italian ppl.

     

    You are incredible man...

    First point

    I have used the same photos because I am lazy

    So I didn't want to do again photos for the same platform so I decided to put the same photos

    This does not means that I want to cheat!

     

    Second point

    You aren't god man

    I don't need your info ;)

    This is not Italian aim...

×
×
  • Create New...