Turrican

hehe, the guy only benched the cpu tests here's the link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603208

hi guys here's a super pi results of a duron 1800 which is in the wrong categorie (athlon xp-m 1800+) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604359

hehe, yeah it's quite fast

although 3dmark and other programs recoginze the cpu as a k6-3, it's a k6-2+. even cpu-z doesn't recognize the cpu correct -->it shows "amd k6-3+ or k6-2+". but there's on hint to see if it's a k6-2+ ot k6-3+. it's the on-die l2-cache. the k6-2+ has got 128kb and the k6-3+ 256kb l2-cache on-die for example, here's a super pi screen form the k6-3+ 400 @ 619mhz. see what i mean

new results with the k6-2+ 550. @ 2.4V (stock is 2.0V) this one clocks like hell the highest stable clock was an impressive 744mhz (124x6). unfortunately the mobo is limiting me. so the max. is "only" 800mhz (133x6). pci & agp clock was already way out of spec, but the HDD didn't care. :lol: super pi @ 744mhz (124x6) with disabled l3-cache: the lowest temp i achived idle (-29°C) : an impressive 800mhz: but only windows stable. not super pi stable i guess it's the mobo. 3dmark01 (3315 Points): 3dmark03 (just for fun :lol: 854 Points): aquamark3 pcmark2002: best regards, Turrican

i've now also benched 3dmark01 on a few cpus. the results aren't that great, but it's all about fun, hehe p 233mmx @ 334 (with L3 Cache enabled)----->1726 Points K6 266 @ 450 (with L3 Cache enabled)----->2131 Points k6-2 500 @ 619 (with L3 Cache enabled)----->2550 Points k6-3 400+ @ 619 (with L3 Cache enabled)----->3180 Points on the p 200 w/o mmx, 3dmark01 didn't run because of no mmx support. next, i'm getting a k6-2+ 550. yep, that one with 0.18µ. i hope it will clock much better than the 0.25µ ones. so, stay tuned.

Hi I've tested a few socket 7 cpus under my vapo ls. Since there's no socket7-kit available, i decided to build my own one. Here are some pics: I used a Epox EP-MVP3G5 socket 7 board for my tests. First insulation layer: Second insulation layer (here's already a P 233MMX installed): Third insulation layer: Fourth (last) insulation layer: I also installed the heatpad on the back of the board, to avoid possible condensation: For fixing the evaporator on the board i was using 2 "fastening clamps" (i hope thats the right word in english ): Here, i was installing Heavy Metal Fakk2. It ran pretty good on the K6-3 @ 567Mhz. If you look into my hwbot result you guys wil notice that i use mainly "old" hardware to get points. But i oced every socket 7 cpus to the max, so i think the results aren't that bad. It took me several hours of testing , because first i often got condensation problems. It's also very hard, to get a good contact between the Evap and the CPU, because of the "uncommon Evap mounting" :lol: the used hardware: Epox EP-MVP3G5 (2MB L2(3)-Cache) 2 x 128MB PC133 @ 2-2-2-5 Geforce 4 Ti 4600 AMD CPUs: AMD K6 266 0.25µ @ 450mhz @ 2.5V AMD K6-2 500 0.25µ @ 619mhz @ 2.8V AMD K6-3 450 0.25µ @ 567mhz @ 2.8V Intel CPUs: Intel Pentium 200 0.35µ @ 250mhz @ 3.3V Intel Pentium MMX 233 0.35µ @ 334mhz @ 3.3V these are the 24/7 stable results. for the benches just look at the results in my hwbot-profile. of course the cpu-z max. was a little bit higher, as the 24/7 results. If anyone has questions, just ask. best regards, Turrican

my best buy was my geforce 4 ti4200 in 2002. it oc'ed like hell. 310/650 without mods 335/730 with voltmods cooled with air. (socket-A 60mm AL-heatsink attachet to the card ) well, maybe with watercooling more were possible

ahh, thank you i've submitted it in the new category and deleted the old one.

no problem, jmke has moved his result already in the right section (p4 m) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507361 those 2 also should move in the right section. p4 "a" (northwood) 1.6ghz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576173 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575043

wow, that's very politely from you i see you have alreday 48 points. so, when the new category is made, you can submitt your p4 results and have 50+. good luck.

yeah, i hope there will be a p4 nothwood 1.6ghz section soon. //edit: i see your are also approching in cpu-z.

thank you, i did my best with the willamette to get the WR hmm, maybe due the new hwbot update it got lost or something like that. ..and what about the second posted result? (wrong categorie and no verification) maybe the screen got also lost, because it was scanned on 30-11-2006 12:12. would be great, if a new section for p4 1.3 to 1.6ghz "A" (northwood) could be made.

hi guys i just wanted to report that in these 2 results, there's no screen, verification or anything. SuperPi - 59.02 sec - jmke ([M]adshrimps) 2 points - [ link ] - [ compare ] Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 1600mhz [#1 Pentium 4 1.6Ghz in SuperPi] [ compare cpu ] Videocard: videocard unknown Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware of this user. no image Hardware Rank: 1st Pentium 4 1.6Ghz - 2.0 points Description: P4 M 1.6Ghz, 512Mb Verfication: Scan date: 22-03-2006 12:49 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507361 same applies here CPU-Z - 2776 mhz - Ebola (OverClocking-Ma...) 2 points - [ link ] - [ compare ] Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 2776mhz [#1 Pentium 4 1.6Ghz in CPU-Z] [ compare cpu ] Videocard: videocard unknown Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware of this user. no image Hardware Rank: 1st Pentium 4 1.6Ghz - 2.0 points Description: Intel Pentium 4 1.6 @ 2776 MHz | Northwood | IHS poncé | PAL8942 Verfication: Scan date: 30-11-2006 12:12 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560147 could that be fixed, please? also, i think there should be a "pentium 4 1.6ghz "A" categorie, because a few people post the reults of a pentium 4 "northwood" in the "Willamette" categorie. for example: the second result i posted above thanks in advance, Turrican