Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

saltycroissant

Members
  • Posts

    434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by saltycroissant

  1. Its not because the benchmark is reported Valid that it isn't bugged. If you want to play the: Who can bug the most X benchmark, then HWbot isn't for you.

     

    The rules are there not because we just want to add more.... but because ppl will abuse every little bug that exist to get some internet points.

     

    Yes some benchmark have different requirements, and its for the best. For exemple 3D03 (and the sub scores rule).... just today, i had to remove a score where GT3 was 3 times higher then all the other scores. This just highlights how some ppl won't take even 30sec to think how they got a score so high and will sub right away and because of that rules have to be constantly updated.

  2. 9 hours ago, TonyBombassolo said:

    Any chance we could as a site start standardizing the submission rules since we are changing submission policies?

    Allowing LOD/Tess manipulation on these older tests and allowing incomplete screenshots that cutoff any aspect of the desktop are inconsistent with other policies about OC'ing imo, specifically when those submissions dont even pass the muster of the benchmarks in question.

    Are we really serious as a site about all the tests being fair or are a few big wigs just mad they aren't on top of a few benchmarks and are correspondingly bullying staff into changing just those?

    Rules are changed because some ppl think its 100% normal that adding 25mhz to the memory of a gpu will boost its performance by 10%....

     

    For the allowing incomplete screenshot, nobody should be covering settings or important part of the benchmark, if you see this pls report those scores.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...