COMIAS

Hello everyone (sorry for my english it's google that translates) Stage 2 - Unigine Superposition - 1080P Xtreme - RDNA - 3 scores impossible to post a score with an RX 7700 XT. > your submission is incorrect While everything is good and well informed while I was able to post the score without problem on HWBot https://hwbot.org/submission/5375925_ The RX 7700 XT is part of the RDNA family, so I don't understand. Who would have an idea?

Bonjour, cela fait suite a un bug au niveau du code AGESA, qui a étais corriger a la sorti de la dernière version. mais le bench a fait étais fait avec tout les cores.

Désoler mais sur un écran 15" en 1366 x 768, c'est plutot compliquer de tout faire apparaitre!

http://hwbot.org/submission/3497269

oui vu, je referais sa demain

la totalité de quoi ?

??? pourquoi?

http://hwbot.org/submission/3495834_

More system memory ??? Explain me? By the way, I'm in stock, not OC. It is voluntary.

Par contre vous n'avez pas mis le bon screen, c'est un screen de 3dmark03 et non de 3dmark 05

Good evening, I started this afternoon, the test windows 7 x64 with the same version of JRE9 & co for win10 x64. I also have a Windows XP Pro x64, so I may be also take the test, to see .... The config rest InChanger only Win7 x64, everything is clean. So I'll post the results soon. and the Excel file, which allowed me to make the tables.

Well here is the latest version of the test, with some more information. - By cons is that the may have noticed is that the run 1 and run 2 are generally the lowest. - The run-3, is not to keep, - The run-4 is good about 5/25, - The run-5 is good on 7/25 - The run-6 is good on 6/25 - The run-7 is good on 3/25 - The run-8 is good on 6/25 Therefore generally meulleurs scores are obtained on run 5 and run 6 run 8, as well as the run 4 and run 7. By sometimes against both run on the same version we give the same scores. 2/25. As for the version of 144 and 123. Why? it is the right question.

The difference between basic and save-save-hwbfor9 is that some version takes no basis, the expected backup Hprime. And I used HWBotPrimeFor9, created by Spiedie which corrects the backup problem. I'll look to find this version. And see what happens. By cons here is a improved version of my test Hprime JRE9 with some info that seems utils. (thank you google for translation)

Hello, I carefully read this post on JRE9-xxx, And that my given an idea, appearing great advantage of JRE9 version, ie the version 105 to the 131 (the latest available), with my condif H24. All appear with lesi latest version of JRE8, JRE7 JRE6 and x64 versions. You can find all the information on the test protocol and the config on the screenshot. I would test the future of all its version with a Win7 x64, appearing order. My config: CPU-Z VALIDATOR (PS: sorry for my crappy English, but translated for me google that)

It is a not a R9-390X, is R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816