COMIAS

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

It is a not a R9-390X R9-390! Have see directly with the number of shaders. R9-390 = 2560 / = R9-390X 2816

I simply increase my virtual memory is 8192 MB 0 MB And I can walk in a settings Y-cruncher, option 3. I joined you the validation file of Pi-1B if cel may help you to understand, that was changing. By against Y-cruncher, is very hot CPU .... my i7 4790K has 4.5Ghz, above 80 ° C in benchmark ..... Incidentally, his will that everyone sticks the screenshot to their score as many do that put pictures of their config. too bad. PS: sorry for my english but I translated with Google.

No changes, and even the stock has hardwares that me also displayed. Pi-25m goes smoothly but Pi and Pi-1b-10B, its not want to know. every time I have the right to error.

Hello, I have a recurring problem, each time I run into Pi-1B or even 89%, I have the right to a message: Redundancy Check Failed: coefficient is too large. an idea?

For stage 1 how do make a XTU in 2000 with i7 (4770K / 4790K etc ..) to max 4/8 ??? facing the 5xxx i7 socket 2011? It's totally impossible! So unbalanced placement basis Advent begin! This is not how HWBOT, will bring in new on the site!

Therefore limited only to the Division 1 i7 quad core. And the problem will be resolved. Because I do not think the only one to think that for the XTU course, the i7 quad core, have no opportunity to pass, socket face 2011-2011v3. Ditto for Cinebench R15. On the other challange, it was not divide the number of cores, so why not this channlange there?

The Stage XTU ans tha stage cinebench, is wrong because all those who are equipped with i7 - 4 cores have no chance against the i7 2011 and 2011v3.

R9-390X + 980Ti ??? Tu pense que certain ne regarde as les lien 3Dmark en détail ? et notament quand il y a une carte secondaire sur ses liens.

R9-390X + 980Ti ??? Tu pense que certain ne regarde as les lien 3Dmark en détail ? et notament quand il y a une carte secondaire sur ses liens.

R9-390X + 980Ti ??? Tu pense que certain ne regarde as les lien 3Dmark en détail ? et notament quand il y a une carte secondaire sur ses liens.

R9-390X + 980Ti ??? Tu pense que certain ne regarde as les lien 3Dmark en détail ? et notament quand il y a une carte secondaire sur ses liens.

R9-390X + 980Ti ??? Tu pense que certain ne regarde as les lien 3Dmark en détail ? et notament quand il y a une carte secondaire sur ses liens.

All Windows based, except for Windows 8 based operating systems (W8, W8.1, and Server 2012)

All Windows based, except for Windows 8 based operating systems (W8, W8.1, and Server 2012. No:MaxxMem main window MaxxMem overall score MaxxMem Read Bandwidth subtest score CPU-Z CPU tab CPU-Z Memory tab

Screenshots too small!

CPU-Z unreadable

CPU-Z unreadable

CPU-Z invisible and lack GPU-Z....