Ginner

I used SetFSB 2.2.134.98, I can't remember which exact setting, since it's 8 months ago I did it. I won't be home to check until maybe next week. Though I curious as well to know what it took to hardmod til PLL chip :) All I can tell you right now, is that I can see from photos that it's a Cypress PLL chip. Will investigate and return with an answer.

Yes but as I said, that one has 4/1 Pixel/vertex shaders, mine has got 2/1 config.

or tell me where I should add my score, the mobile radeon 9000 in the list is with 4 pixelshaders and 1 vertex shader. Mine have got 2 pixel and 1 vertex. So I'm wondering abit where to put it, as Mobile M7 gpu seems like the closest match for mine, including gpu-z picture. It resides inside an old Acer laptop. Regards Ginner

Thank you Massman :-)

Hi, I have a score with a Geforce 6600 AGP DDR, and got reported for missing GPU-Z screenie, but back when i made the bench it wasn't required. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600303 AquaMark3 2007-04-26 21:14:22.0 - Ginner: manual online submission 2008-07-19 15:08:06.0 - Ginner: manually modified by owner (Ginner) - reason: AGP series has been added to HWBot 2009-09-23 02:02:15.0 - Doominheart: reported by user due to lack of validation () Rules: have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show score, processor in CPU-Z, videocard in GPU-Z (as of 15 may 2008) I wonder why the report was accepted by an admin. Regards Kasper

Hi, sorry for asking but I have an Acer Travelmate 2001 with an ATI chipset and IGP. But I don't know where to put the results. The chipset is called ID5833 in CPU-Z and southbridge is SB200 it is for s478 cpu's even though it is a laptop.. The IGP is a RS300M core. But I can't really find anything on neither the chipset or IGP core. And the other Radeon 9000 chips in the database is based on other core numbers I hope someone can help me Thanks in advance

lol, I asked for the same cpu to be added :-P 2 tickets before you

Ticket ID: 56 Priority: Medium Please add Mobile Celeron 600 Mhz, http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=392617\r\n\r\nIt runs at multi: 6x fsb: 100 mhz\r\nnormal S370 Celly 600 runs at 9x 66mhz

result and screenshot does not match in time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661908

The whole Celeron 350 for S478 section is wrong.. all results are Celeron M 350..

I've got a Ford Escort CLX Van from '94.. drives nicely

Couldn't find anything on your motherboard though about vmods

Sounds wierd, I couldn't even keep my Northwood B 2,4 ghz cold enough to be stable at 3 ghz.. have to goto work now.. will look more into it, when I get home again

anyone else got an idea ?

which kind of cooling do you use Emperor ? If you got good enough cooling, it can be vdroop stopping ya, or bad cpu stepping.. I've got a Pentium 4 Northwood 2, 2.4 GHz (533 fsb) which can't go higher than 3060 mhz using watercooling that can get my C2D up to 4 ghz, My board is a P4C800-E Deluxe, which vdroops 0.1V.. I've lent it to Nosfer@tu to vmod it, and then I will try again to see of it helps to higher oc, or i'll just have to satisfy with, that i've got a lousy cpu stepping.. heh =) Edit: is it a Northwood C or a Prescott ? and which stepping, or take a CPU-z screenshot and post it ^^

This is the PCI-e version.. so no unlockable pipelines on the NV41 core.. opposed to NV40 on agp version..

I've got a Geforce 6800LE, which has got vgpu mod, and is running 500 on core and 445 mhz on ram (890 DDR).. And cpu Xeon 3070 @ 3,78 GHz when testing.. And then I see P.A.S.S.A.T's result with 6800LE.. he is at 400/420 mhz on core 410 mhz on ram.. and has a Xeon 3070 @ 3.9 Ghz.. and I can't really understand how he can get higher score with 100-80 mhz lower on core, and 35 mhz on ram.. even though his cpu is 120 mhz higher it shouldn't do that much for the scores.. here is the link for the 6800LE class http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1195 Can anyone please explain/check it for me.. (included P.A.S.S.A.T) would like to ask him too.. but couldn't find mail in his profile.. Regards Ginner

Several Northwood 2.0 GHz posted as Willamette 2.0 GHz... this one has been verfied by moderator, but screenie shows NW http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547537 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=270&thumb=false Would admins plz check this out and move them to their correct place?

as well as several other runs under E6700 are also QX6700. everyone in E6700 wPrime 32M under 17.xxx seconds are false(to be moved to right place)... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602648 (he got 2 QX6700 under E6700, anonymous) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=601014 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602078 (as are all of his E6700 scores, AnRo) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=595815 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598307 This one has no verification link, but compared to the other QX6700, it looks pretty similar, so i would guess it's also a QX6700 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=596235

found another one that was verified by a moderator.. a Q6600 wPrime run, as a E6600.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602474

it said it was verified by a moderator, so couldn't set it under suspicion where i saw it.. thats why i wrote it inhere

results posted a bit wrongly he posted as 1777 marks, but the ORB link says 1177, http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570563