[HWBoints Adjustment #1: 3D WR Bonus]

That is bonus. It would be added to general hwpoints. It is just a reason to get higher.

[HWBoints Adjustment #1: 3D WR Bonus]

Sounds good, imho. That makes sense to bench top CF and SLI for WRs. And as far as 01 & AM are mostly cpu dependant in case of hi-end gpus, that would suit as single GPU benchers, so multi GPU fans in case of 03/05/06 and Vantage. I.e. you can get your bonus using single GPU, so you can get your bonus in case of CFX.

[Jon Magoon..loonym..R.I.P.]

R.i.p. ((

[Videocard specifications requests : GeForce FX5200 32bit]

Ticket ID: 751

 

Priority: Low

 

I found this card:\r\n\r\nAlthough GPU-Z says it is 128bit, in fact RT is right and results say so too.

[GraduS - 2x GeForce GTX 280 @ 770/1333MHz - 133391 marks 3Dmark 2001]

Great result!

[Mip and D-PP: how do they affect 3D06?]

Well, this tweak is easily noticed - the balance between SM2.0 and SM3.0 changes after D-PP cheat.

[w prime top 20 validation problems]

Give sample of those bugs in CPU-Z to explain the situation better, Foxtrot.

[wPrime --->checksum(invalid)<---]

1.63 is necessary to submit validations saved under 1.55 AFAIK. So it would be just a submission tool, not benchmark one.

[AndreYang - Core i7 Extreme 975 @ 4876MHz - 32709 marks PCMark 2005]

Oops, sorry, Andre! I found out it is display resolution there and it doesn't influence performance issues. Congrats!

[AndreYang - Core i7 Extreme 975 @ 4876MHz - 32709 marks PCMark 2005]

What's on with the resolution? It is 1680*1050 instead of normal 1024*768 - not default run, in fact.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641935 - no cpu-z, gpu-z screens. Too high score for such clocks.

[-> Validated score still wrong? Let us know here]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200

Check this 7600GS result. No cpu-z, gpu-z. Settings are hidden by result screen. This is obviuosly not 7600GS DDR2.

[strange]

Have noticed bug with 05 too. Got better result on HD2400 Pro resulted in gold cup, but still no scores are in my total scores - as if I'm still on 4th place. Although I can view those points for first place when viewing that result.

[Um this score is not right. #1 in pcmark vantage?? nope!]

To report an incorrect score use the main site's report score tool.

[where the results of this 9800GTX+]

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+9800+GTX%2B+%281087%29&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1364&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

 

Change just the name of benchmark in searh filter for other tests.

[Videocard specifications requests : X800XL DDR PCI-E (R430)]

Ticket ID: 596

 

Priority: Low

 

I have R430 based X800XL with DDR. HWBOT has only GDDR3 based X800XL in its database.\r\n

[TiN2x GeForce 7900 GS @ 541/750MHz - 37705 marks 3Dmark 2003]

Nice job, I think of the same water-cooling system now)

[F1OC round one. OCer of the month VOTE]

Vote for NeoForce - his attitude to this competition and overclocking in Russia deserves it.