Just Learnin'

Was only joking! Just went with what it said under your Username.

Thanks Lurking [M], erm.... unh... I mean jmke.

I believe you but it creates major contentions when screenies are improper and I would have no qualms having mine blocked if done improperly. I do have issues with some that have beaten scores of my own that were improperly submitted yet were "validated" by hwbot even though they left a lot to be desired. Just want to keep the playing field level is all. Is the resolution required to be visible in 3DMark 05 as well? His 8800GTX scores don't show that in the screenshots either.

You are welcome, just trying to let you know what I find. Okay I did each one individually jmke, will check back and let you know if it worked or not. EDIT: You beat me to the punch! Hehehe... I understand that there is no reason to believe they are cheats, I did not say they were in my reports. It seems funny that he never blocked the resolutions when he used cards other than the 8800GTX though.

You missed the rest of his 3DM06 8800 GTX scores, all are hiding the resolution. I will try to report them again using the report tool but the first time I tried that it blocked his next highest score from being reported.

You do very nice work Demiurg, thanks. :woot:

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651656 Screenshot in the link to forumpost shows a Prescott in the Northwood category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713455 Screenshot shows error in computation time. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660164, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660163 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660165 All appear to be the same CPU which I am fairly certain is not a K6 200MHz.

:woot::ws::celebration:

Invalid Verification link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599771 Project Submission Failed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631486 Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628664

Is there no setting called NB Vcore that is the North Bridge Voltage on the Deluxe model anyway. http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=41

Is it ok to block the resolution in 3D03 free version? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610010

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636541 No Screenshot, invalid futuremark link

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651302 I believe he did what he says but he accidentally linked to someone elses Futuremark validation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642568 Futuremark link invalid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 , http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560164 Description and screenshot show 3.4E Prescott CPU, result is in 3.4C Northwood category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641402 Submitted four days ago, old SuperPi and no CPUZ in screenshot.

I'm sorry I don't see where you get the score date? I was going by the 14/11/2006 scan date in the entry: Just trying to understand?

9 months ago CPU-Z never existed?

I would like to know if it is possible to bring back the feature from the previous version of Hwbot that allowed one to click on the CPU in an expanded 3D benchmark which opened a screen showing results of your CPU in comparison to others with that CPU in the 3D benchmarks? :ws:

Is this screenshot http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/188/pentium4c34ghz4690mhzws6.jpg acceptable for a valid CPU-z score? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972

I am no expert but at 4-4-4-8 with 2.2 volts it runs 800MHz easily. I have had that Crucial kit to near 940MHz at those timings benching using 2.4 volts. I have no experience with the corsair.

Sorry for repeating myself: No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743

No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743

Well if the resolution isn't visible in the 3DMark popup I thought it was not an acceptable screenshot? That is/was what I was asking in the first place....