Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Lippokratis

Members
  • Posts

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lippokratis

  1. The solution to 389 posts of "you're an evil corporate bitch" is quite easy:

     

    - Team League = as it is now

    - new PowerTeam League = only best scores count

     

    This way you can see the team thrust in the normal league and the true quality (assuming quality equals higher score) in the PowerTeam League.

     

    with that Rev4 sounds okay for me, but waiting for a beta view

     

     

    short question about EL and XOL. did i understood it right, that all user, beside UFL benchers, are in the EL and XOL and the ranking in this league is depending on the results and cooling method. for example. i bench mostly with air so high rank in EL but somtime some dice scores. so the dice scores count for XOL so that i raise my rank in XOL with subzero benching or can i be only in one league?

     

    and how to proof subzero benching? not that someone benches with dice or SS and put it in the air categorie. with older CPU it is hard to detect. please think about that. may just put El and XOL togehter

  2. I bench for my team not myself..

    total agree. there are many bencher there can't battle in the overclockers league so they search for an other goal - to push the team, but this motivation can be destroyed thru rev4.

     

    and why is there already a new rev? the break from rev 2 (best in my eyes) to rev 3 was gigantic and now the most of the benchers has adapted but leave it a time so. you are not the formula one, you must not change the rules every year.

     

    if you want to avoid hardware sharing just say "please attach a picture of your card/cpu and a note with the nickname". you can't total avoid hardware sharing but in this sports it is difficult. but to penalize the small benchers by deprive the motivation to bench for the team is the wrong way

  3. If I visit a page for a specific CPU or GPU, it defaults to CPUZ or 3Dmark01 when I click on the 2d or 3D rankings. However, if I want to check some other benchmark, and I click on wPrime/AM3 (or whatever), and open up some interesting result, and I press back to view the list I get redirected to the CPUZ/3Dmark01 rankings no matter what rank I viewed the last time.

     

    yeah that is a little bit annoying.

     

    are there teamranking for each benchmark like in rev2? and than where?

  4. What about a combination of rev3 and rev2? For 20 or less results the rev2-Point-System and everything above using the new system.

     

    So everything would be fine. Popular hardware will be rewarded much and unpopular also a little bit but not too less....

     

    very good idea

     

     

    Lippokratis had a couple of sli/cf scores (not THAT many, but probably quite valuable in rev. 2 because of the bug that HAD to be fixed, as it was rewarding 3d-benchers with WAY too much boints than they really should have had).

     

    i had 2 multi GPU settings there were only 20 points not more i'm more the cpu bencher

     

     

    what is when some benchers making more than one submission in one benchmark of one hardware - so that the number of submission raises while there are not more competitioners

     

     

    what is with a quad core cpu where i disable 3 cores - is this counting as a single core in wprime? or in others ways - can i bench with a quad core all of the wprime ranking underneath?

  5. you call us ignorant, yet when we ask feedback ONE month ago, nothing.

    we post URL to test and dev server, ask for feedback, nothing.

     

    now "everybody" hates rev3.

     

    going from rev1 to rev2... same discussion, over and over again.

     

    a fantastic idea starting a testserver at chrismas holiday when everybody is sitting in front of there pc and not making things with there family

     

    wait for the days after january 1st when all the other benchers are back from there holidays

     

    when your have the next changes to come, post it when the futbol championship is - then you will also not getting any criticism

     

    by the way the testserver was buggy

  6.  

    try to say something about the others things i said in my posts not just answer one single point.

     

     

    on this rev it is possible that 400 submisiion of unoverclocked hardware are making more points than 100 submmision of overclocked hardware. more submission doesn't meen competition it just means that many peole use this hardware

  7. If there's no competition, the 1st gets 1,5p. If there are 10 competitors you have >2p.

     

    the first gets 2 points but the second gets nothing just a silver cup filled with no points. why don't you said

     

    less than 10 submission rev3. point system less points but not 0,1 points for an second place

    10-19 submission a mixture of rev2 and rev3 with a firm placing points

    over 20 submission rev2 with in max hwpoints of 75

  8. Let me put it this way: Rev3 equals

     

    "Having competitive harware instead of expensive hardware"

     

    and competitive hardware is expensive hardware - well done - the circle is complete

     

    if you wanted to give the bencher of the mainstream hardware more points why don't you just raised the max hwpoint limit up to 75 and done.

     

    the thread here shows you that there ist something wrong with the rev. 3 14 pages in just a few houres and usa isn't awake

     

    we are the people!!!!

  9. the new rev. is total sh*t

     

    how can it be, that you get the same among of point for an E8500 @ 3GHz and for an E8500 @ 5GHz. Why should i bench the Cpu? to get an absolutly senseless achievement. the point that in rev.2 just money makes the points(4xcf etc.) is now even so. you just get points with the newest/mainstream hardware.

    i spend hour the find the best Cpu's on ebay und the right boards and now it's all for nothing. wath is the diffrent to spent 3-4 houres search von vmolt/boards etc. for old hardware than for new hardware?

     

    your argument for splitting the wprime enchmark is so lame. in the toplist there where only in the Top20 servers and with the years and new multicore cpus there were a change in progress. so for pcmark05. split this benchmark bei HDD/ xp startup and not by Cores. an ssd makes more points than an doubled core number.

     

    my recommendation is back to rev2. points algorithm and keep the splitting of the gpus and cpu( wprime - sockets; pcmark05 - hdd)

×
×
  • Create New...