Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

tiborrr

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    545

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by tiborrr

    Bwanasoft's insufficient proof in 3DM2001SE

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Probably due to suspection of result sharing, because Moonman had result with 6600GT & QX9650 with same clockspeeds. Those weren't the same GeForces, although platforms & even Windows installation is the same. We had some ideas about SLI'ing them with old modified drivers at that time.

     

    Anyway, it doesn't matter, i have improved my 6600GT results on a E8500 under SS, it can easily be deleted.

     

    That was really my last post.

     

    Greetings & good luck,

    N.

    Bwanasoft's insufficient proof in 3DM2001SE

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    None of the scores are suspicious, they are in line with what to expect, just because the screenshot doesn't show 3D01 run's details, doesn't make the score a cheat.

     

    Oh really, so then anyonce can make 21st best 2001SE result (with around ~ 100k) with no results tab given & a photoshoped CPUz, GPUz or ATiTool/Rivatuner and nothing will be suspicious?

     

    Well maybe you should re-write rules. Just a combo box showing result isn't enough, where's the details about each and every test. It's too easy just to swap some numbers and make your result to the top of every (& especially hwbot rich) class.

     

    Looks like this HWBot is a more of a hoax every day. Yes, my results gets deleted because i didn't follow the rule that was introducted on 01.01.2008, although the bench took place before that date... Yeah, that sounds really fair. I've spent 16 straight hours benching, providing every proof and you just seem to delete it few months after.

     

    Get a grip, he's an admin, just say it... If there was any other user, he would get his results deleted.

    Bwanasoft's insufficient proof in 3DM2001SE

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Hi,

     

    i would like to address this issue about Bwanasoft. Although he is administrator of hwbot.org i think the rules should apply to all.

     

    All of his 3DMark2001SE results lack ORB link or at least (i consired it sufficient proof giving) opened details tab about each of the test. Results should be blocked due to insufficient proof of validity - it's easy to post result of another HW or edit the score with the simple MSPaint. In many cases there isn't even CPUz opened.

     

    To sum up once again, here are the results that lack proof:

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648681

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684014

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720952

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720971

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716041

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720962

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720947

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652274

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716068

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720992

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657195

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720977

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716034

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653481

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670063

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622507

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690911

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616317

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691230

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690903

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690920

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657222

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691237

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716050

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658352

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654562

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721001

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624142

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670182

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678375

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630118

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678710

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=716062

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663726

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622497

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657188

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686630

     

    If there are rules, they should apply to everyone, administrators included. And if there is justice, these results will get blocked and/or deleted just like everyone's that doesn't comply to the rules.

     

    Greets,

    N.

    Yet another mipmaped run

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Demiurg, i don't think we're on the same page - i wanted to point out that Joe, Noname & Moonman have quite higher GPU/MEM/SHDR clocks while all (including Nachty, FOGNA, ...) have roughtly the same CPU clocks. Therefor there was something fishy about it.

     

    Everything's OK now, natural order restored. Thank you.

     

    Greets,

    N.

    MIPMAPS involved?...

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Hmm, i have access to about five 8800GT's, all from the same store, virtually all the same. I'll run them @ 5.52-5.55GHz CPU and GPU's at 1050-1083MHz, gave results to all of my buddies from the team and give my team a great boost :)

     

    No one will ever know if i do that. Does that sound fair? :)

    Amd VS Intel

    in General hardware discussion

    Posted

    My history:

     

    AMD 486DX2 40MHz

    Intel Pentium 120MHz

    Intel Celeron 333A

    AMD Athlon (T-bird) 900MHz

    AMD Athlon XP 2100+ (T-bred B0)

    AMD Athlon XP 1700+ ( - || -)

    AMD Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton)

    AMD Athlon XP-M 2400+ (- || -)

    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ S939 (Winchester)

    AMD Opteron 144 (Venus)

    Intel C2D E6300

    Intel C2D E6400

    Intel C2D E6600

    Intel C2D E6700

    Intel C2D E2140

    Intel C2D E8500

     

    That's my history i guess, i had few more chips for a shorter period of time, those listed i had for at least half a year.

×
×
  • Create New...