Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Afrokalle

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Afrokalle

  1. Nice benching bro ~ Looking forward to your start with GPUs@LN2 hahaha always secret...secret benching, secret backup, secret weapon....
  2. Gratz bro ~ you're tha man for the big one.... C'mon now show us sub5.30min@@@
  3. Nice run buddy ~ This is a really strong chip... ....keep pushing!!
  4. nice (retail) chip buddy... push a few MHz more and you will beat this taiwan machine
  5. haha Tin (I think he don't want to talk about ) 31k Single Card is real Damage!
  6. Gratz bro!! Seems that you get the efficiency problem solved....keep pushing
  7. When you're near the benchtable the WR's falling and falling....Gratz Dude!! btw: nice pics
  8. i heared that the score get removed cause there is something wrong with the loops (all steps of this run and the final result are not like it should...) So i think hwbot never removed a score when everythiong was fine (why should they do that?) and cause of this fact Nick's result is actua thel hwbot record (and for me WR too)
  9. Really nice for only 1.8v mate.. Now change MB, got to -170°C and push it to 1.9v
  10. Congrats Nick for this crazy run and for taking first spot! Really impressive what you did last weeks... ...keep pushing (and show us sub6)
  11. This time is not possible with your clocks... If you would play fair and if you would look at the others scores you must see that this is impossible. Look at the wPrime ranking you have same time like others with 5400MHz - 5450MHz http://www.hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/wprime_32m/rankings?cores=4 So what is so difficult to except that this score is a bugged run?
  12. Really impressive what you're doing last week(s) Congrats to this huge scores...
  13. Sorry i thought this section is the right way (discuss doubtfull results)... Lots of people posting here strange results. Next time i will use report function.
  14. Hello, can you please check this result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=905347 it's to fast for the clock speed and (normal you need 5300MHz+ to get sub. 16s) all results with more speed (not only @W3520 - @all i7) are much slower. Then it is with Win7 which is slower than XP... Thank you Afrokalle
  15. Can you please check this: http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=1741&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 First and second place is since a few days the same person (and for first result he got global points and for second hardware points). Thank you
  16. Please Check this result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=888626 User hast more than 200MHz less speed on his CPU but is a lot faster than all others... His result is only possible with a CPU@5400MHz+ and high uncore. Regards Afrokalle
  17. Hi, this user submitted the wrong time in Pifast: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=871803 he submitted his series computing time and this is not the total time of the benchmark. Thanks and regards Afrokalle
  18. it is physx!! This run should be blogged...
  19. Sorry that i have to start a thread here.. I did a mistake today - was benching all the night and very tired - so i posted my 3DMark05 Result in 3DMark06 category. After posting i saw my mistake and reported this to hwbot team. Someone moved my result from 3D06 category to 3D05 - thanks for that... But the score is already blocked. In the report stands that i need a FM Link (cause its a top 20 score) but it is not a top 20 score (not in 3D05 category) Can you please check this: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=861993 Thanks Afrokalle
×
×
  • Create New...