websmile
-
Posts
5824 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
58
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by websmile
-
-
Awesome, everyone will hate you now :D - better get some sandbags^^
-
1
-
-
OK, I bought an rgb kit for daily use
- because of this 240 shipped worldwide for the Corsair as final offer
-
What an impressive sweep, grats :)
-
Good run, Ikki-san, I have the kits 02 and 04 btw
-
Kit #1 was as close as it gets to 2100 Cl12 of what I sell at the moment, sorry
-
1
-
-
First and final bump
-
Why do you think these are not correct? You get global points in relation to no 1 result on percentage and top 5 get bonus points on top of this. I think on hardware the same, but not sure if top 5 or top 3 now. This is determined by date of submission iirc when results are identical. This was made to prevent especially on xtu that 150 guys get top spot points at same amount. richba5tard can explain this better, but that\s the main scheme
-
G.Skills are sold, payment already received, thanks
-
May I ask why you see the score as bugged? With newer generations we have a lot of fluctuation at cpu speed reading, it can vary up to 5-10 mhz at identical bclk settings. This is annoying but also a fact which can be not even fixed by disabling spread spectrum
-
1
-
-
Hola,
up for sale are two waza capable DDR4 B-die kits. Please note that due to my own mistake(I sold my better imc cpus too early) I had to test these on an imc not capable of 12-11 spi32m above 4k, so please read the description carefully
1. 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-4133 C19-21-21-41 1,35v
Datecode 1803, Samsung B-die, tested for 4190 12-11-11-28 tight geekbench 2,17v and 4133 12-12-12-28 spi 32m waza 2,14v on apex x. The kit should be easily capable to run this at 12-11 but even with pretested other kits I have, I cannot do a run above 4000 at 12-11. Includes original packaging
2. 2x8GB Corsair Vengenace LPX DDR4-3600 C18-19-19-39 1,35v
Used at daily driver for a while, I now tested it for oc and it is capable of 4133 12-11-11-28 tight 2,08v geekbench and 4150 12-12, waza Spi 32m at 4100 12-12-12-28 220 2,07v no problem, not minmized on volts. 4133 will be hard to do on air, and imho 12=12 is needed for 32m, different from my impression on kit 1. Includes box with fan
Prices
1. 300 Euros+shippig sold
2. 240 Euros+shipping
Payment is possible with paypal (buyer covers fees or gift) or bank transfer. Shipping with dhl at eu is around 15 Euros, deutsche Post worldwide should be around the same.
-
This discussion is weird, I just got a link on this. You pull the cable, you are cheating, and if you are unable to read the rules thatstate the rendered image has to be visible you are not very clever. When you then publicly make a big fuss what a super cheater you are by publsishing stuff like this, you have to live with some feedback you might not like. I saw lots of results at my time as mod and on some you could see irregularities, but the main problem is grey zone at fps. So, to make it short, yes, some people killed this benchmark
-
1
-
-
Done
-
I will take the i3 if it is still available
-
4 hours ago, Traktor said:
WEBSMILE Thanks Man! Now I See The Rules
Bui At Link Is Already 3.2 its Ок Or Not?
Always newest version is OK, normally we write 3.2 and latter to make this clear, but at the moment it seems to be a bit stressful for the coders
-
RB forgot to update the gpu ;link, look at cpu benchmarks
-
Pre-testing air in progress
- thread needs some life signs 
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, No1Spank said:
Ok thanks everyone, I'll have to do some re benching then.
Is it the same for Cinebench 15 & 2003?
Yes
-
The point distribution is still bugged
-
-
-
Thanks for the good intentions, but the links are better way
-
This is algorythm issue, please stop reprting the scores because this will not help but cause chaos and tons of extra work = thanks
-
1
-
-
42 minutes ago, richba5tard said:
I don't understand. Don't give global points for 3x / 4x GPU rankings for 3D06, but do for 1x / 2x? We don't have that functionality. I can mark 06 as "single threaded" which would mean all amount of cards would be mixed in 1 ranking.
Are you sure? Maybe you might mix up world record and globals, just a wild guess
http://hwbot.org/submission/3785121_ikki_3dmark05_2x_radeon_hd_4870x2_77128_marks
http://hwbot.org/submission/3724101_dancop_3dmark05_geforce_gtx_980_ti_92221_marks
There is a global ranking for 4x and one for 1x for example, but for world record there is just a single ranking. Of course I do not know if you can configure this, but in theory this could work.
P.s. in worst case and this is not configurable single threaded would be OK, but we still have the Aquamark problem then which due to the bug scores higher in sli than single despite not scaling. I think Rauf will give info on this^^
-
This was a decision made to balance the ranking, hwbot already pushed really hard towards 3d with rev7 and it was decided we can not over-emphasize this even more. I would have no problem with re-enabling globals for 06 single if we balance the ranking by finally stripping 3 and 4way multi card for 01,05 and 06 and 2,3 and 4way for aquamark 3. Reason is no scaling at all for 3way and higher for legacies and for am3 2way as well bc it is bugged.
-
3
-
leeghoofd - Celeron G470 @ 2120MHz - 0.611 fps HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k
in Result Discussions
Posted
Who is Luumi? I think you should thank that Justin Wong