trodas
-
Posts
1129 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by trodas
-
-
Maybe he just got a good voltage regulator on mobo and good caps for the Vcore regulator...?
-
I did not wanted to increase the server load... okay, I try it next time and we see if that fix things or not
Thank you. -
Once again, this SuperPi 1M result is "sleepy"... pls fix?
-
Heheh, try some AMD K5 or P90...
-
wPrime 1024M test finished w/o any troubles now!
A big thanks to TerraRaptor for help - w/o him I did not know, that "the problem with time - transfer from 23.59 to 00.00 makes wprime crazy" ... So I set the time to 0:01 and then I run wPrime 1024M test again, for the 3th time. This time no cheating complaining from wPrime!
Thanks, TerraRaptor! :celebration:
There is the score:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2973738_
A "bit" slower that I expected, but... time for optimizing Windows come
-
checking on dishwashers
-
Slight bump?
-
160MHz? How is that possible? Ram timings? How much Vcore? So awesome overclock on so old mobo, wow! Breathtaking.
But it is weird to see there different clock speeds:
post screen - 160MHz
TestCPU - 153MHz
CPU identification - 126.3MHz
I believe that old version of CPU-Z will work on the older version of Windows just nicely and show the proper clock
If not, then there is this little 4k utility for showing the CPU clock too: TSCWin 1.0http://falcosoft.hu/softwares.html#tscwin
It does absolutely nothing, besides showing up the CPU clock. Size - 4744 bytes. Asm source included. Might be worth checking out, I try it on my 10.7MHz machine as soon, as wPrime end it's 1024M run: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=145068 For the 3th time...!
-
Very nice indeed. You show who is the boss there!
What are the ram timings? And what is the black box mounted on the PSU? Some added stabilization or...?
Pretty nice score anyway. Since my only one Socket 7 board cannot get past 83MHz FSB, I did not stand a chance in the K6 battle (not to mention not having K6 ATM in the first place), but the result is still IMHO impressive. I wish I can run modern graphic card that give plenty of resolution as well. 800x600 suxx
-
HWbot forum is growing - that is a good sign
-
What the... :-O That makes sense, but... this is a serious bug. Dunno if to hope not confirmed or confirmed on this... but we will know in like 17h ...!
-
Okay, I try wPrime 1024 at lower FSB... but that will make the run even slower. In the long run, I will add some caps to help the stability at FSB 83 - I cannot add more Vcore (3.5V), so... maybe mod the VRM then. Oh, well - time will tell, I go for it.
-
I twice run the HWbot wPrime v1.55 on the 1024M test with same results:
wPrime is telling me, that I cheating. What the hell...? I just use overclocked Pentium 90 to 125MHz and that it is. The machine is stable, it did SuperPi 32M anyway:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2971047_
...and I did not run any software over standard WinXP. In fact, I did not even touch the machine. And the computing time is not that great, after all. 15,75hours aren't anywhere near fast to get to the 94%
So, what could I do to produce P90 @ 125MHz wPrime score?
-
There are plenty of Crucial Ballistix ram types:
...however these "classic standard DDR2 Ballistix" seems to be missing, unless I'm mistaken. So just a "Ballistix" as type should be added...
...or I should be told, what these are:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148069
SO, I'm confused, or the simple Ballistix is missing?
-
No idea, what frequency to expect on the ISA bus, when running ref / 2 clock. If the 8MHz ISA clock is taken from the 24MHz by 3x divider, then at situation, when it is not 24MHz, but ref / 4 (3,575MHz), then we have to expect condition like 1,191666MHz on the ISA bus...
Just plain math. It is probably better idea to force the VGA mode that works just well... even if that means - God forbid! - 640x480 in 16colors
I would hope for 1024x768, but that is not going to happen... so 800x600 in 16colors I maybe can manage? In case of 640x480 I would just need more validation screens, lol...And I did not have any ISA card to try and getting a good one like Tseng ET4000AX sounds kinda expensive with the unclear perspective on the working situation...
-
So what is the verdict? Are CPUz rejected validations going to be allowed in the low clock challenges? I thought that WAS part of the challenge?
Unfortunately IIRC only CPU-Z validated scores are allowed. If they are not, prepare to lose against my 7.14MHz FSB on Socket 7 :-)
-
I'm planing my GPUPI run, so I need to be sure when the deadline is.
I would care more about witch hour of the 30.9. the end happens. I quess that submission made till 23:59 is okay, right?
-
I have Quimonda DDR(1) sticks and they are good too, gotta finally test their limits after proper bios clearing...
ATM I made them to only 230MHz or something... But in good mobo, they can do "3-3-2-8 timings with 2.7V at 265MHz" according to Strunkenbold and I have no doubt in his words.
-
Thanks!
-
Ah, that is why there are short supply of the 550MHz models!
Thanks for the heads up!And I did not only want AMD K6 III, but K6 III+ is a must
Indeed is true, that not many boards support them, but there are bios patches that helps, adding the support... so it this will work as advertised, then it should not be any problem for me to make these CPU's run in my Asus TXP4-X mobo.
2 years to find AMD K6 III that bench at 620MHz? Interesting. I find in day czech guy, that have AMD K6 2 500AFK. But it is not III and not + either...
And given the fact, that one can overvolt these CPU badly and easily, then I did not understand, why the problems...
-
Dont want to know how many subs have no rank because of that.
Investigation time?
-
Great, thank you!
-
Much nicer, thanks!
-
Yea, the fastest Socket 7 CPU with the "+" variant for some multiplicator changes is wanted
Illustration (only 2+) image.
There are some good deals on eBay, but they are usually closed kinda fast for me and not featured the III+, only 2+:
Or there are III+, but 400MHz only:
...so I just wonder, where are the III+ at 550MHz hidding
:D
Wizerty - Core i7 5960X @ 5896MHz - 45425 points Geekbench3 - Multi Core
in Result Discussions
Posted
Very nice indeed. 8 cores at 1.700Vcore and 5897MHz? That must be a hell of PSU to cope up with that demand! I'm only confused with the given info of rams (G.Skill 12-14-14-20) and the CPU-Z info (10-13-14-14 & Kingston). But that is a innocent mistake that can be easily corrected, right?
It takes LN2 to push 1.70Vcore to 22nm CPU... poor CPU! Have a mercy on him!