May 13, 201411 yr TCCD is not the right choice for 462/478 imo (my estimation is some hynix sticks may be even better if they go 300 2-3-3-8). There is no sense in async overclocking on s462 (anyway you won't go higher than 260-265 cpu s462) and on s478 250 2-2-2 is faster than 320-330 3-4-4. TCCD imo only make some sense when using s939 - low latency mem controller may yield some boost with high bandwidth normal latency tccd when compare to low latency normal bandwidth winbond.
May 13, 201411 yr Author TCCD is not the right choice for 462/478 imo (my estimation is some hynix sticks may be even better if they go 300 2-3-3-8). There is no sense in async overclocking on s462 (anyway you won't go higher than 260-265 cpu s462) and on s478 250 2-2-2 is faster than 320-330 3-4-4. TCCD imo only make some sense when using s939 - low latency mem controller may yield some boost with high bandwidth normal latency tccd when compare to low latency normal bandwidth winbond. Hello TerraRaptor and thank's for your opinion,but I write for test,not for score I have 2 nf7-s and 3 dfi lanparty,i want test max fsb fsb/ram 1:1 and with bh-5 is not easy,because over 260 1:1 is very hard with winbond modules.
