T0lsty Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 4eetingg... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 What's wrong now?;| Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Well the big problem is that the ORB link does not match the result posted. And the screen-shot does not include the items I indicated to you in a previous thread where needed. So you just need to provide the correct ORB link and then all is good. PM (not start a new thread but send a PM) to Thor telling him you have updated the submission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Now should be good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 the problem here is the video encoding score its impoosible to get numbers like that without using the media encoder tweak tool or reg hacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Guys, I swear there's no any hacks, any registry mods or anything. In fact, similar settings but with a little higher or lower FSB makes points about 11k. Other thing is efficiency grows not only in PCMark, but in e.g. Aquamark and MaxxMEM, and also is really noticeable in games and normal PC using. In some operations, it was a lot more efficient than my overclocked C2D E4400. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 xpstart up low/ hdd test low/ video encoding score is through the roof, hence the high score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 (edited) xpstart up low/ hdd test low/ video encoding score is through the roof, hence the high score. The HDD test isn't low EDIT : oups I have read the wrong one(I looked at the ORB link), in fact it is very low, seems normal Edited January 15, 2011 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 (edited) 23.9mb? or am I reading it wrong? im looking at the orb link. the vidoe encoding score and file decription scores make no sense at all. Edited October 23, 2010 by Bustah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 (edited) 23.9mb? or am I reading it wrong? im looking at the orb link. the vidoe encoding score and file decription scores make no sense at all. Oups my bad, I have read the wrong one Anyway : File descryption : too high Transparent windows : too high Audio compression/video encoding : too high Others multiThreaded tests seems to be ok even if they are a bit high Edited October 23, 2010 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 (edited) Oups my bad, I have read the wrong one Anyway : File descryption : too high Transparent windows : too high Audio compression/video encoding : too high Others multiThreaded tests seems to be ok even if they are a bit high my thoughts exactly. This benchmark is not this easy otherwise everyone would be getting scores like this. it must just be a bugged run... Edited October 23, 2010 by Bustah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 my thoughts exactly. This benchmark is not this easy otherwise everyone would be getting scores like this. it must just be a bugged run... With all run bugged Maybe he found something new that is going to be forbidden in the future Waiting for moderators and djzatorze news Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 With all run bugged Maybe he found something new that is going to be forbidden in the future Waiting for moderators and djzatorze news yes there are well known reg hacks or media encoder tweaks that cause in particular audio and video encoding scores to go crazy through the roof. which is why I focused mainly on those two scores. It's debatable wether those are 'cheats' or tweaks. I do know that hwbot does not allow them, they are nothing new. I'm not saying this user knowingly used them I think He is probably unaware but when you compare this score with others something is clearly not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 yes there are well known reg hacks or media encoder tweaks that cause in particular audio and video encoding scores to go crazy through the roof. which is why I focused mainly on those two scores. It's debatable wether those are 'cheats' or tweaks. I do know that hwbot does not allow them, they are nothing new. I'm not saying this user knowingly used them I think He is probably unaware but when you compare this score with others something is clearly not right. As he said that changing FSB he gets 11K. So when doing 17K it's maybe because tests were bugged due to high overclocking(FSB). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 yes I don't think this guy cheated I think its a bugged run as you say, 5k difference with a small fsb change indicates a bugged run, though saying that bugged runs only usually affect one aspect of a bencmark so i'm unclear, hopefully someone can give a clearer explanation on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 So how does work 'reg tweak'? I have never been using, or I've been unaware (?), but my 'hacking' limits at copy the crack in some game installation (shhh...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 So how does work 'reg tweak'? I have never been using, or I've been unaware (?), but my 'hacking' limits at copy the crack in some game installation (shhh...) If you don't know you don't need to know, there are very clear indications when they are used. I don't think you cheated at all I do think the score you got is bugged or something, your score is impossible in the hardware used at those clocks....under normal circumstances. you have 8k more than anyone in the p4 520 category for pcm 05 and 3k more than anyone in the single cpu category using slower hardware/ clocked lower etc, tweaking skills alone could never give you that kind of a difference. If your score were legit I would be the first to congratulate you, but I dont believe it is just a quick look at the orb link tells me its not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 I realize it's strange:) You probably think 'oh, yeah, guy with aircooled, old-fashioned P4 scores 17k, R U kidding?'... I was shocked, too, but at the same settings but different RAM timings the score was 15k (but I screwd the submission;[ ) There may be some bug in benchmark, but I have seen changes when I e.g. clocked down the graphics. When weather gets colder, I try to repeat benchmark at similar settings, and we'll see:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bustah Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 It's nothing to do with the fact you are using air cooling, you are not using irams or acard or even ssd to get the hdd test scores where the major bump in score comes from with this benchmark. Do you really believe that 8k [p4 520 category] or 3k more single cpu without irams acard or ssd will gain you that much of an advantage? ...its not possible I can assure you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 But XP startup, HDD General Usage, HDD Virus scan ale normal... so what's the point? To be honest, I would be 500th without any censures, than 1st and embattled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 But XP startup, HDD General Usage, HDD Virus scan ale normal... so what's the point? To be honest, I would be 500th without any censures, than 1st and embattled. Yeah these tests are normal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 You're suggesting that the only normal?;] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 You're suggesting that the only normal?;] No, see post # 10 : File descryption : too highTransparent windows : too high Audio compression/video encoding : too high Others multiThreaded tests seems to be ok even if they are a bit high And of course HDD tests are OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djzatorze Posted October 23, 2010 Share Posted October 23, 2010 Well, I propose that I make couple of benches soon, and eliminate every strange-looking... But it's a pity:/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.