Bug reports : Delete (combine with existing) false CPU categories

[Antinomy]

Ticket ID: 1075

 

Priority: High

 

1. Combine this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_2235 with this http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_930 and delete the first one.\r\n\r\n2. Delete this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1325 these never existed, even CPU world doesn\'t know of such and ATM it\'s much more trustful than our database (I hope this will change in time though I don\'t have a chance to help you on this).\r\n\r\n3. Delete this category: http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_346 it didn\'t exist either.\r\n\r\n4. Delete both of these: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_1.4ghz_northwood - there are two of them on the hw subfamily page: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=16\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/community/submission/822670_ice_angel_cpu_z_pentium_4_1.4ghz_northwood_4683.27_mhz\r\n

the id of this result is 509168, cpu-z shows wrong cpu identivikation, its not a 1.4es, its a 2.8c

That means that the result is identified incorrectly. This bug comes out during overclocking and is quite known (sometimes Celerons are identified as Xeons and like that). Will report to CPU-Z author for a work around. I know the probable reason of this bug.\r\n\r\n5. Rename \"Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Willamette\" into \"Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Willamette s478\" like the rest are.\r\n\r\n6. Making a space between the frequency and \"GHz\" would fix the bug \"when the CPUs are listed as 2.0 then 2.26 and then 2.2\".\r\n\r\n7. Replace \"Ghz\" with \"GHz\" \r\n\r\n8. Rename \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz A Northwood\" into \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Northwood\" and \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Prescott\" into \"Pentium 4 2.4Ghz A Prescott\" - Intel gives the \"A\" suffix for the new generation models which was definitely not Northwood.\r\n\r\n9. Same here - rename \"Pentium 4 2.6Ghz A Northwood\" with \"Pentium 4 2.6Ghz Northwood\" no need in \"A\" suffix since it\'s a regular core, not a new model with existing frequency.\r\n\r\n10. There were only five models of Pentium 4 2.8 for socket 478 - the \r\nregular 2.8 (Northwood, 100FSB)\r\n2.8A (Prescott, 133FSB)\r\n2.8B (Northwood, 133FSB)\r\n2.8C (Northwood, 200FSB, HT)\r\n2.8E (Prescott, 200FSB, HT)\r\nSo this category should be deleted: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_4_2.8ghz_northw._200_fsb from what I\'ve seen all of the results are 2.8B (Northwood, FSB133 multi 21) not even 2,8C with 200FSB. I bet these categories are messed up not only by default FSB but even by cores (once the categories are fixed, I\'ll check the results and report to place them in right categories).\r\n\r\n11. Pentium 4 2.8Ghz E Prescott (HT) is called \"Northwood\" in the cores column. Rename to Prescott.\r\n\r\nAt the moment, this is it for desktop s478 stay tuned for reports on other sections.

[Turrican]

ok, i'll look at everything today evening.

[Antinomy]

Thank you. It's the mods fault the didn't accept me as a h/w category moderator so I'll be making you work instead

[Turrican]

it's ok, i would be bored without a bit work.

[Antinomy]

So how was you evening reading yesterday?

[Turrican]

So how was you evening reading yesterday?

 

there were database problems as you might know, so i couldn't work properly.

today it should work.

[Antinomy]

I can bet I've seen Turrican not only yesterday but today too

[Turrican]

i've you have looked into s478 you would have seen that a few things are already done.

category delting can only be done by admins as i pointed out already earlier.

[Antinomy]

Sorry, Karl. If it's not hard, could you report on ticket progress here? It's harder to recheck all the categories that are reported than a single thread

 

I see big improvement, as I thought, the spacing solved the "2.26GHz before 2.2GHz" problem.

 

I remind about section 7 - rename "Ghz" into "GHz". By leaving "hz" you disrespect Hertz, the guy who was a physicist and he's German BTW

 

And even though you can't delete categories, I think you could move results from there to the right categories

 

Thank you for the cleaning!

 

P.S. Rename "Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz A Northw. (100 FSB)" at least into "Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz Northw. (100 FSB)" - without the "A" letter. Or better in "Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood" like it's with 2.4 GHz CPUs. Missed this one.

Edited October 21, 2010 by Antinomy

[Turrican]

hehe

yeah, i'll report here what is done.

[Antinomy]

ATM I see that sections 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 are done completely.

 

There's left "GHz" issue, the 2.8 GHz Northwood renaming and moving the results from categories that are going to be deleted

 

And kicking admins from time to time.

[knopflerbruce]

If you need to rename some empty categories, you can always add some opterons I know that some of the 940 8xx series are missing, for example the 854. I've also got an i7 870x here... Will post some links soon.

[Antinomy]

It's about deleting false categories and correcting the names of existing, not adding new

[knopflerbruce]

It's about deleting false categories and correcting the names of existing, not adding new

 

Yes, but if he can rename empty ones instead of deleting them, it's less work for massman - and probably turrican himself too:D

[Turrican]

yes, we can basically "re-use" it for new requests later.

[Antinomy]

Well, you're write, Bruce. Didn't think of this from the point of moderation

[Turrican]

ATM I see that sections 5, 6, 8, 9 and 11 are done completely.

 

There's left "GHz" issue, the 2.8 GHz Northwood renaming and moving the results from categories that are going to be deleted

 

And kicking admins from time to time.

 

ok

 

2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are done.

[Antinomy]

Thanks, Karl!

As for the 10. - were did you move the results? I think there could be results from different categories. I've reported on 2.8, 2.8A, 2.8E a few days before so if you tell were you moved them, I won't have to check them again. Or you looked through the results moving them in appropriate categories?

 

Just get me right - I don't find a reason to offense smbd. In fact I only try to make a nice thing closer to a perfect one. I don't spend my time on bad things, only on the ones that deserve it. So I don't make any critics if it's a bad thing - only if it's not good enough but can be better.

[Turrican]

as of 10, i only renamed the category a bit.

yeah, it would be nice if you could report those results, so they can get moved.

then i can take actions on that categories.

 

no problem.

[Antinomy]

Oh, I see. Yesterday I've looked and mistakenly seen there 5 P4 2.8, quite odd. I'll check the rest and especially the http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_335 as it is a wrong one. So the results will get removed to proper places and then deleting or reusing the category

[Antinomy]

Reported on the results that I can see. I would be glad if you could check the user profiles so all of their results in this CPU/bench could be removed. Because the browsing system shows only the best results. Double check this please.

[Turrican]

number 1 & 4 have been solved as well

Edited October 30, 2010 by Turrican

[Antinomy]

Thanks, that's great news! Good work and a very nice result as for me

 

I'll seek for more work for you today.