Badrig Posted May 17, 2008 Posted May 17, 2008 theres nothing to say about i think everybody knows this benchmark and its easy to use Quote
jurek Posted May 17, 2008 Posted May 17, 2008 question is if we need more benchmarks... answer is rather not... we have 3dmarks for graphics we have aqua for overall we have pifast wprime super pi for cpus what would give us cine? maybe good for 4 cores... in future we should move to benchmarks that will be in this 3 categories mentioned above graphics, overall, cpu and in every category there should be less benchmarks possible (only those which best fit in every category and are best validable and so on) thats my humble opinion Quote
Badrig Posted May 17, 2008 Author Posted May 17, 2008 am3 is quite old i think its no objective allround benchmark ... and it's not multithreaded cinebench is the best cpu bench in my opinion prime and pi calculators tests only fpu but not the whole processor Quote
jurek Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 cine tells that 4 cores are better than 2 coz its optimized for 4 cores and can use them but the truth behind is that most applications, games and so on aren't optimized and pifast and others would tell u what u really get for money spent on cpu and what is real life difference between 4 cores and 2 cores for example and the sad truth is that for common user 2 cores are best choice and pifast and others show that and if only looking at cine one could make decision bout buing 4 cores which would be wast for him by not using them Quote
Badrig Posted May 18, 2008 Author Posted May 18, 2008 and because of this fact we need it as new benchmark Quote
jurek Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 yeah if we sorted benchmarks in categories it definetly would be handful but... it hasnt verification feature has it? if not we shouldnt hesitate to add it Quote
Dualist Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 cine tells that 4 cores are better than 2 coz its optimized for 4 cores Works even better with 8 Quote
jurek Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 Works even better with 8 really? i dunno this benchmark but i doubt it is optimised for 8 cores Quote
Dualist Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 Like Wprime it's pure SMP, uses what cores are available and uses it. Just like NuclearMC, another great SMP benchmark. Quote
jurek Posted May 18, 2008 Posted May 18, 2008 Like Wprime it's pure SMP, uses what cores are available and uses it. Just like NuclearMC, another great SMP benchmark. wprime cheats Quote
Dualist Posted May 19, 2008 Posted May 19, 2008 wprime cheats No it doesn't, it uses what's available. Quote
jurek Posted May 19, 2008 Posted May 19, 2008 No it doesn't, it uses what's available. could do the same thing u said using million threads Quote
knopflerbruce Posted May 19, 2008 Posted May 19, 2008 could do the same thing u said using million threads ...and why not make it 10^24 threads while we're at it? More (useless) threads = better? I don't think so. Using as few threads as possible, combined with as much performance as possible is what's the best. It's not like wprime tweaks your subtimings and has a built-in copywaza, or something. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.