Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Wait... So you're saying that Cpu-z and CpuWorld are both wrong??

 

Does that also include the s939 Cpu list Wiki wrong as well?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Opteron_microprocessors#Opteron_100-series_.22Venus.22_.2890_nm.2C_socket_939.29

 

Opteron 148 2.2 GHz 1 MB 1 GHz 11x 1.35/1.4 85.3 W Socket 939 August 2, 2005 OSA148DAA5BN (E4)

2.2 GHz 1 MB 1 GHz 11x 1.35/1.4 85.3 W Socket 939 August 2, 2005 OSA148DAA5CF (E6)

 

EDIT: Oh I see. CpuWorld just doesn't have the Opteron 148 listed however they do have the 146. Access denied

 

I've tried Cpu-Z 1.72- 1.76 and 1.79 all show the same thing.

 

San Diego Part #

 

OSA148DAA5BN is an OEM/tray microprocessor

OSA148BNBOX is a boxed microprocessor

 

Venus Part #

 

OSA148FAA5BK (E4) Access denied They do has it!

OSA148DAA5CF (E6)

 

I'll have to pull the heat sink for part number. I will do this at a later time.

Edited by ShrimpBrime
  • Crew
Posted

Those Venus parts are all s940.

 

Part Number s940: BK

Part Number s939: BN

 

The question is, which core is the correct one. I probably just ignore what CPU-World says and rename the categories to Venus.

  • Crew
Posted

I just changed the names back to Venus. I think, since we dont know if its really a san diego or a venus and its making virtually zero difference, lets just stick to that what CPU-Z tells us to avoid further confusion.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...