Crew Don_Dan Posted February 15, 2011 Crew Posted February 15, 2011 Nice score, very well done! Less efficient due to the smaller Cache I guess?! Quote
SteveRo Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 Woah! How did I miss this! Much congrats - looks like you got a good one! Quote
chew* Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 yes it seems 2mb less cache = 20 mhz lost effeciency give or take. Quote
xoqolatl Posted February 15, 2011 Posted February 15, 2011 I'd say it's much more than 20 MHz, you're just so damn fast Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.