Crew Don_Dan Posted February 15, 2011 Crew Share Posted February 15, 2011 Nice score, very well done! Less efficient due to the smaller Cache I guess?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveRo Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Woah! How did I miss this! Much congrats - looks like you got a good one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 yes it seems 2mb less cache = 20 mhz lost effeciency give or take. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linuxfan Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Great run man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoqolatl Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 I'd say it's much more than 20 MHz, you're just so damn fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.