Crew Sweet Posted February 22, 2011 Crew Share Posted February 22, 2011 Hi, boblemagnifique, please your CPU is Athlon XP 1600+ or Athlon MP 1600+ ? You upload like XP, but Cpu-z show MP Thanks for your help in this. Sw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 Hi Sweet , it's a true XP 1600+ (AX1600DMT3C) but the last CPUz bug with my NF7 rev 2.0 my all cpus (for exemple : L2 Cache = 64Ko) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 22, 2011 Crew Share Posted February 22, 2011 i have this problem with the l2 cache on palomino cpus as well , but only if i apply high vcore (2.1V+). with stock vcore i have the full 256kb l2-cache. i think the l2-cache "problem" isn't cpu-z related, but cpu? you can tell by the performance of the benchmarks the used l2-cache is really only 64kb then. so i don't think it's a read error by cpu-z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 yes maybe , i have test my XP 2200+ and no problem for the cache L2 (256Ko). The core is crumbled but it's alive for the moment ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 22, 2011 Crew Share Posted February 22, 2011 this seem only apply to "palomino" cpus and not "thoroughbred" or "barton", so no wonder the 2200+ is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boblemagnifique Posted February 22, 2011 Share Posted February 22, 2011 I have the same problem with my Barton 2500+ => http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=541423&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg I can try soon on my other mb abit NF7 rev 1.2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.