71proste Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) 7300LE 64mb 3dm2006 796marks Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Gh... @ 3830mhz GeForce 7300 LE 64 ... @ 600/700mhz Scan date: 31-01-2009 05:11 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=816918 drivers 181.22 and few days after same user scored 1089 marks with almost exactly same setting(only graphic memory 70mhz higher and cpu speed 70Mhz less),same drivers: Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Gh... @ 3780mhz GeForce 7300 LE 64 ... @ 600/765mhz SM2.0 429marks HDR/SM3.0 320marks Scan date: 07-02-2009 10:50 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=819563 drivers 181.22 I leave it under moderation, in my opinion mipmap was used ,but im not the one who make decision ..edited... Edited February 10, 2009 by 71proste Quote
Maxi Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 Actually it's not, memory clocks make all the difference on bandwidth starved cards, the quad also factors in here. Btw you mixed up your SM 2.0 numbers with his. Quote
71proste Posted February 10, 2009 Author Posted February 10, 2009 First post edited,forget about my SM 2.0 numbers that was my mistake... I'll show u tomorrow what I mean Let me install exactly same drivers and run same setup. Quote
71proste Posted February 13, 2009 Author Posted February 13, 2009 Ok, I knew that something must be wrong The wrong resolution,thats' the reason and I thought about mip...whatever 1024/768 instead of 1280/1024 please remove it: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819563 Quote
tiborrr Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 (edited) Can you please check this too: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=821918 1) CPUz mem tab not shown 2) Duplicated results/system -> http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818794 This guy (Perko) is a known cheater that got caught: http://www.oc-lab2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=62725#p62725 Thanks, Niko Edited February 16, 2009 by tiborrr Quote
knopflerbruce Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 Can you please check this too:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=821918 1) CPUz mem tab not shown 2) Duplicated results/system -> http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818794 This guy (Perko) is a known cheater that got caught: http://www.oc-lab2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=62725#p62725 Thanks, Niko You can also add that it says DDR3 in that 7.11s pi run. Doesn't sound very normal, but I'm not very experienced with Intel setups, so I leave that one to the mods. Quote
tiborrr Posted February 16, 2009 Posted February 16, 2009 DDR3 is a known bug in CPU-z, that's not a problem. Problem is result spreading among multiple accounts! Besides, they're irregural. All of his SuperPI results were proven faked. Quote
tiborrr Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Will you please look into it? Thanks, N. Quote
71proste Posted February 17, 2009 Author Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) Hehe,what a bullsh.... Even the icon´s are in the same position,exactly same desktop These stinky scores should be removed immediately !!!(my opinion) Edited February 21, 2009 by 71proste Quote
tiborrr Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Agree. Moderators, can you please have a look at it? Regards, N. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.