Please check result

[rbuass]

PLease check the E6500K result, if its possible.

I know my memory isn t good (i used the worst memory), but i think that the diference is higger than normal

 

 

PiFast Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

893022

1. PiFast - 24.1 sec - Eiswolf93 (PC Games Hardware) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 4462mhz on Air) 2.1 points - [ ]

 

892883

2. PiFast - 27.06 sec - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 5284mhz ) 1.7 points - [ ]

 

SuperPi Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

893019

1. SuperPi - 11sec 870ms - Eiswolf93 (PC Games Hardware) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 4900mhz on LN2) 2.1 points - [ ]

 

892884

2. SuperPi - 14sec 730ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 5383mhz ) 1.7 points - [ ]

 

SuperPi 32m Hall Of Fame: (view top 100)

893023

1. SuperPi 32m - 12min 14sec 30ms - Eiswolf93 (PC Games Hardware) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 4427mhz on Air) 2.1 points - [ ]

 

892886

2. SuperPi 32m - 16min 3sec 140ms - rbuass (Team Adrenaline) - (Core 2 E6500K (2.93... @ 5184mhz ) 1.7 points - [ ]

 

Do not say you hear failure, but may have been some bug of the program (that I do not know).

Just ask them to check to verify that it is ok

Thanks

[Massman]

The difference is significant indeed. Too bad there are so little results available to compare to.

 

Comparing to the results of the Pentium E6300 (http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_e6300_2.80ghz) the results of Eiswolf seem to be correct, so yours are way off.