dinos22 Posted October 26, 2011 Posted October 26, 2011 Thanks all, i had screenshots on one of the HDDs and guess what i copied the wrong backup drive's backup folder LOL. I emailed the guys at UK office to extract the files for me but essentially we could bench up to 7Ghz 3DMARK11 which is really nice. I wasnt expecting that. Talking about not expecting something, macci mentioned on livestream he didnt expect us to hit 8GHz. Something tells me we might be pushing way past 8.2 once we actually test more than 1 CPU LMAO Quote
dinos22 Posted October 26, 2011 Posted October 26, 2011 btw guys, we identified a problem with LLC, btw this is version 1.1 board with LLC implemented. On the highest level of LLC it starts to affect stability past 5Ghz. When I dropped to one level down i was able to bench at 7Ghz 3DMARK11 (we figured it out 5 minutes before the end of 3 days benching OF COURSE LMAO). Anyways dont use the highest LLC setting when benching... Quote
tiborrr Posted October 31, 2011 Posted October 31, 2011 What batch? 1139GPM i tested was stuck at 7.3GHz. Need moar CPUs Quote
dinos22 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 i uploaded a couple of scores with 4 cards...... we just used 2GHz NB, Auto ram timings etc so from that aspect it could have been a bit better but efficiency was still off. I also have a 4way score with 4.2GHz 1090T on the database in which GT1 for example was way ahead and i bet CPU scores would be stronger too if i tried it at 5.5 Quote
dinos22 Posted November 1, 2011 Posted November 1, 2011 Tiborr was that with two cores only for CPUz or multicore benching? so first cpu died coz of llc-10? nar we used the same LLC (extreme present or something like that) with first chip for the 3 days and it had no issues. The chip was probably on its last legs before we got it imo Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.