demiurg Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512mb in 256mb categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 Warpy again http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 Warpy 512 in screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 Warpy no proof fixed, but keep your eyes open, they can be back
Bwanasoft Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 wrong categorie.there should be a s3 chrome s27 categorie made. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705310 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705309 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705303 added and edit
manos_ir Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 there is no cpu verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566278 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602716
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted March 5, 2008 Posted March 5, 2008 Tell more details, what exactly does not match? ok the result is 117.08 seconds but the verification(screenshoot) shows 2 minutes 37.080 seconds. So... the result is wrong.
jabski Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665284
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665284 Fixed
S_A_V Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 all matched to wrong videocard: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702331 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707296 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707737 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706911
jabski Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664894 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675621
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 all matched to wrong videocard:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702331 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707296 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707737 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706911 fixed
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696821 - no resolutionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696837 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603477 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600686 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692046 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697450 - no resolution and not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635599 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617256 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689226 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656283 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697503 - no resolution + GPUZ show card as X800Pro (category is X800GTO) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662401 - not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677102 - no resolution and invalid orb-link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683825 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 - Dupe. Look at forum post - it's Micutzu score quoted by sabinus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573373 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570788 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552132 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679184 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680980 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650276 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598036 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679185 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - not informative screen in forumpost http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - no link and no screen, only forumpost without any verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679186 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684597 - 9k in 3dmark05 on single 7300GT? I don't think it's possible with only 818MHz GPU clock, even with 5ghz Yorkfield. 3dmark05 is only GPU dependent with this slow card. Low MIP Textures may be? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684601 - the same as above. too high SM2.0 and HDR scores for only 818MHz GPU. Low MIP Textures again? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692775 - wrong category: 7900GT in 7300GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617130 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634426 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617133 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685854 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685173 - impossible fps in both HDR tests for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685347 - too high score for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 - 35k GFX score on single 7800GTX with only 485/655MHz? That is 10k higher than other cards with way higher clocks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686196 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678574 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601818 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686374 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601819 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686395 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665906 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694272 - 3dmark06 with resolution 1024x768! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697169 - unreadable and no informative screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567488 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079 - 12564 in 3DMark06 with single card @ only 640/1000mhz and AMD CPU??? No orb link, no screen, forum post not accessible for guests. Description says that is 8600GTS (score in 8600GT category). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567762 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687092 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638637 - FPS in Deep Freeze at least on 10 higher than normal for specified card clocks (694/1008). Looks like bugged run for me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630333 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560621 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581957 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695256 - verification link is broken and no resolution on screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695258 - no resolution fixed
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664894 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675621 fixed
Veld Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661126 - suspicious result (some guys clocks their Celeron s478 2.4GHz up to 3.4-3.5GHz and got ~71..71.5s; but there is only 3.164GHz and 70.38s.. perfect tweak? I don't think so.. perhaps, it's PiFast 4.3) Please check it..
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Warrior_oF_ByteMy fault, bad math Fixed No problem! thanks a lot for respond quickly.
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 there is no cpu verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566278 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602716 why you didn't fix these ones? also...... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 how can we see if it is the right card?????
K404 Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697378 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=706411 The last one might be alright because of the GDDR clocks??? Thanks
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back)
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661126 - suspicious result(some guys clocks their Celeron s478 2.4GHz up to 3.4-3.5GHz and got ~71..71.5s; but there is only 3.164GHz and 70.38s.. perfect tweak? I don't think so.. perhaps, it's PiFast 4.3) Please check it.. fixed. p.s. It`s not PiFast 4.3
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 why you didn't fix these ones? also...... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 how can we see if it is the right card????? fixed
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back) fixed
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 Demiurg, ok.. sorry for trouble.. No problem at all
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 how you are proving that aquamark runs on the correct vga ...without a gpu-z ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 i would like to understand it ! because you don't ask gpu-z in aquamark...
DopeLex Posted March 6, 2008 Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=707593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=708271 Both wrong category -> not "GMA 965" but "Radeon 3870 crossfire" and/or "Radeon 3870x2 crossfire"
Recommended Posts