demiurg Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512mb in 256mb categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 Warpy again http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 Warpy screenshot shows 512mb in 256mb category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 Warpy 512 in screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 Warpy no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 Warpy no proof fixed, but keep your eyes open, they can be back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 wrong categorie.there should be a s3 chrome s27 categorie made. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705310 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705309 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705303 added and edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 there is no cpu verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566278 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602716 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 Tell more details, what exactly does not match? ok the result is 117.08 seconds but the verification(screenshoot) shows 2 minutes 37.080 seconds. So... the result is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665284 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Warrior_oF_Byte My fault, bad math Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665284 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 all matched to wrong videocard: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702331 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707296 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707737 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706911 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabski Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664894 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675621 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 all matched to wrong videocard:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702331 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707296 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707737 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706911 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696821 - no resolutionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696837 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603477 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600686 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692046 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697450 - no resolution and not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635599 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617256 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689226 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656283 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697503 - no resolution + GPUZ show card as X800Pro (category is X800GTO) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662401 - not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677102 - no resolution and invalid orb-link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683825 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 - Dupe. Look at forum post - it's Micutzu score quoted by sabinus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573373 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570788 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552132 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679184 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680980 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650276 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598036 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679185 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - not informative screen in forumpost http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - no link and no screen, only forumpost without any verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679186 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684597 - 9k in 3dmark05 on single 7300GT? I don't think it's possible with only 818MHz GPU clock, even with 5ghz Yorkfield. 3dmark05 is only GPU dependent with this slow card. Low MIP Textures may be? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684601 - the same as above. too high SM2.0 and HDR scores for only 818MHz GPU. Low MIP Textures again? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692775 - wrong category: 7900GT in 7300GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617130 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634426 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617133 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685854 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685173 - impossible fps in both HDR tests for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685347 - too high score for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 - 35k GFX score on single 7800GTX with only 485/655MHz? That is 10k higher than other cards with way higher clocks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686196 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678574 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601818 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686374 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601819 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686395 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665906 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694272 - 3dmark06 with resolution 1024x768! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697169 - unreadable and no informative screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567488 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079 - 12564 in 3DMark06 with single card @ only 640/1000mhz and AMD CPU??? No orb link, no screen, forum post not accessible for guests. Description says that is 8600GTS (score in 8600GT category). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567762 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687092 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638637 - FPS in Deep Freeze at least on 10 higher than normal for specified card clocks (694/1008). Looks like bugged run for me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630333 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560621 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581957 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695256 - verification link is broken and no resolution on screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695258 - no resolution fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 pifast 1.43 not 1.41 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664894 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675621 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661126 - suspicious result (some guys clocks their Celeron s478 2.4GHz up to 3.4-3.5GHz and got ~71..71.5s; but there is only 3.164GHz and 70.38s.. perfect tweak? I don't think so.. perhaps, it's PiFast 4.3) Please check it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Warrior_oF_ByteMy fault, bad math Fixed No problem! thanks a lot for respond quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 there is no cpu verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566278 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602716 why you didn't fix these ones? also...... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 how can we see if it is the right card????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 3DM01 results possibly obtained using mipmap- natures FPS are way too high http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=698991 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697378 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=706411 The last one might be alright because of the GDDR clocks??? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661126 - suspicious result(some guys clocks their Celeron s478 2.4GHz up to 3.4-3.5GHz and got ~71..71.5s; but there is only 3.164GHz and 70.38s.. perfect tweak? I don't think so.. perhaps, it's PiFast 4.3) Please check it.. fixed. p.s. It`s not PiFast 4.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 why you didn't fix these ones? also...... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 how can we see if it is the right card????? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Demiurg, ok.. sorry for trouble.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 also... in this one : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703591http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703429 the cpu can be anyone athlon 64 3400+ ( there is no prof that is Clawhammer ) and this one..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570544 has no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649514 no cpu-z (deleted in the past but strikes back) fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Demiurg, ok.. sorry for trouble.. No problem at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manos_ir Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 how you are proving that aquamark runs on the correct vga ...without a gpu-z ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685251 i would like to understand it ! because you don't ask gpu-z in aquamark... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=707593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=708271 Both wrong category -> not "GMA 965" but "Radeon 3870 crossfire" and/or "Radeon 3870x2 crossfire" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695761 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts