valid.canardpc cleaned up lot of cpuz 1.60 & 1.61.x validations

[Christian Ney]

Christian Ney: http://hwbot.org/submission/2326765_christian_ney_cpu_frequency_fx_8150_8181.1_mhz

 

This one has nothing to do with the topic, it's rejected because I didn't use module #0.

 

Furthermore it was done with CPUZ 1.61.3

[I.M.O.G.]

No need to get defensive about your sub - you didn't bother to defend anyone else's.

 

Please reference "could affect" above... You know more about the CPUz bugs than me or anyone here I think. Thread title states 1.61.x. Looking at your first post, I see you clarified 1.61.1 and 1.61.2... I hadn't seen that before, so I lumped your sub into my last post with everyone on 1.60 or 1.61.x in the top 20.

 

FWIW, I have no interest/concern for rejected CPUz validations - they have been accepted in the rankings here for a long time and I know about the other than module #0 issue. I brought this up for what I thought was the same reason you started this thread... To look at rejected submissions made on "highly bugged cpuz".

Edited November 20, 2012 by I.M.O.G.

[Christian Ney]

not enough votes