Is it for justice?

[demiurg]

Hi!

 

I have a question. Why CPU-Z rating focus on NetBurst only? AMD 4200MHz - only 2.5 hwboints, C2D 5600MHz - only 12.1 hwboints, is it fair?

[demiurg]

CPU speed

Speed? Are you sure? I think, it is just a long conveyor in NetBurst`s architecture

[demiurg]

C2D with 4000MHz is faster then CedarMill/Presler with 8000MHz

And get 4000MHz on AMD CPU is much harder as get 8000MHz on CedarMill/Presler IMHO

[12]

May be it would be better to divide processors by architectures and according this dividing give hwboint's?

[fr@me]

12

+1

[SF3D]

Demiurg- You saw DeDal's thread yesterday in topmods.net? You know how long he has tryed to achieve that magig 8GHz barrier It's not so easy to get your cpu speed that high. My celeron didn't go over 6.4GHz no matter what, but I'm not complaining.

 

CPU-Z ranking is all about MHz. Nothing else and that's the way it should be in future.

[Sadhiq]

I think everything's fair... CPU-Z is pure speed, for performances, you still have all the benches

[demiurg]

Demiurg- You saw DeDal's thread yesterday in topmods.net? You know how long he has tryed to achieve that magig 8GHz barrier It's not so easy to get your cpu speed that high. My celeron didn't go over 6.4GHz no matter what, but I'm not complaining.

 

Yes, I do know. And I'm not complaining too

I just think 4500MHz on AMD, 6000MHz on Conroe and 8000MHz on NetBurst must get equal hwboints.

[Massman]

Not really ... cpu-z = just cpu speed. We can't help it if AMD doesn't create such high-ocable cpu's. Netburst may be not superfast, they are oc-able and that's what counts in this ranking.

[Jaan]

But what if hwbot calculate hwboints not from speed, but percent of oc- maybe that would be more honest for hardcore oc-ers?