Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author

C2D with 4000MHz is faster then CedarMill/Presler with 8000MHz

And get 4000MHz on AMD CPU is much harder as get 8000MHz on CedarMill/Presler IMHO

May be it would be better to divide processors by architectures and according this dividing give hwboint's?

Demiurg- You saw DeDal's thread yesterday in topmods.net? You know how long he has tryed to achieve that magig 8GHz barrier :) It's not so easy to get your cpu speed that high. My celeron didn't go over 6.4GHz no matter what, but I'm not complaining.

 

CPU-Z ranking is all about MHz. Nothing else and that's the way it should be in future.

I think everything's fair... CPU-Z is pure speed, for performances, you still have all the benches ;)

  • Author
Demiurg- You saw DeDal's thread yesterday in topmods.net? You know how long he has tryed to achieve that magig 8GHz barrier :) It's not so easy to get your cpu speed that high. My celeron didn't go over 6.4GHz no matter what, but I'm not complaining.

 

Yes, I do know. And I'm not complaining too ;)

I just think 4500MHz on AMD, 6000MHz on Conroe and 8000MHz on NetBurst must get equal hwboints.

Not really ... cpu-z = just cpu speed. We can't help it if AMD doesn't create such high-ocable cpu's. Netburst may be not superfast, they are oc-able and that's what counts in this ranking.

But what if hwbot calculate hwboints not from speed, but percent of oc- maybe that would be more honest for hardcore oc-ers?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...