chew* Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 bugged latency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I put it in the moderation queue, but I think it's pretty obvious, yes. IMO it's better that a mot that's not competing blocks scores like this:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 I put it in the moderation queue, but I think it's pretty obvious, yes. IMO it's better that a mot that's not competing blocks scores like this:) True but then again a mod actually benching this bench would be better at determining whats bugged and whats not. However it doesn't take much common sense to compare your own scores to others to figure out what is legit and whats not. Quite a few legit baseline results out there now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 I just blocked it You're right, I don't think this can be a proper run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayvid4820 Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Because if I have many times smaller than yours my latency can not be lower. As of some 30ns and 24ns mine. Only 6ns least lower latencies. If you do not look at the times in "CPU tweak" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.