knopflerbruce Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 Ticket ID: 1812 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/sx6qyw\r\n\r\nIt does say E3000, but it\'s a higher model than the others. I think I bought it as an E3900. There\'s also an E6900 on HWBot, which says E6000 in CPUz. Do as you wish, but choose between E3000/E6000 and E3900/E6900 - makes the most sense. Quote
Crew Turrican Posted November 9, 2013 Crew Posted November 9, 2013 i think we should stick to the "cpu specification string" cpu-z reports, so e3000 and e6000 should be ok? i renamed them to e3000 and e6000. Quote
knopflerbruce Posted November 9, 2013 Author Posted November 9, 2013 i think we should stick to the "cpu specification string" cpu-z reports, so e3000 and e6000 should be ok? i renamed them to e3000 and e6000. Fine Quote
Crew Strunkenbold Posted November 9, 2013 Crew Posted November 9, 2013 i think we should stick to the "cpu specification string" cpu-z reports, so e3000 and e6000 should be ok? what about reporting bugs to cpu-z? Quote
Crew Turrican Posted November 9, 2013 Crew Posted November 9, 2013 that's christian ney's job. he's aware of the bug. Quote
Christian Ney Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 That's probbably because the CPU you have is an ES only and doesn't have any retail SKU. What's written on the chip knut? QLVM right? Quote
Christian Ney Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Mkay, added to CPUz. With the next build that will come out next week it will be recognized as E3900 and the other one will be E6900. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.