Support

Ticket ID: 556 Priority: Low Hello,Could you add this VGA -Nvidia 7800 GT DUAL-512 MB Limited Edition n° 0817 of 2000\r\nYet I can not enable SLI on X48 motherboard, I have to test it on a motherboard Nvidia\r\nthank you very much\r\nRegards\r\nshivabel\r\n\r\n

Ticket ID: 554 Priority: Medium please add a Pentium 3 1000MHz with a FSb from 100MHz and a multiplier from 10. here is the cpu-z link http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=703979

Ticket ID: 555 Priority: Low Bought a Diamond X1550 256m DDR2 in large office supply store, opened the box found a X1650 Pro, only problem it\'s DDR, so could you add it to your list please.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/5gn2b/\r\n\r\nAle

Ticket ID: 557 Priority: Low I have some results in wrong catagory. Here is cpuz link;\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=595093

Ticket ID: 558 Priority: Low Gpu-Z Valid:\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/hyshn/\r\n\r\nTnks...

Ticket ID: 550 Priority: Medium Hi over there!\r\nPlease add Intel Xeon X3470 @2.93 GHz (LGA1156) to the CPU category.\r\nCan find some screenshots in my teammate\'s results, e.g. here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=896210 ... or here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=896168\r\nThanks!

Ticket ID: 551 Priority: Medium Now that I started reporting others submission based on the code name, I found out that my own result might be in the wrong category. \r\n\r\nCan you please add Pentium 4 Xeon 3.8 Ghz Prescott category or point me to the right one, if it already exists. Sorry for the trouble......\r\n\r\n

Ticket ID: 552 Please add this Vcard R430 based X800GTO PCIE DDR

Ticket ID: 553 Priority: Low http://img198.imageshack.us/i/1222e.png/

Ticket ID: 552 Priority: Medium http://hwbot.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=528&stc=1&d=1252674773\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=529&d=1252674904\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=530&d=1252674904

Ticket ID: 549 Priority: Low http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=795599\r\nThe moderator said that there aren\'t insufficient verification for rankings... but the score was valid through wPrime site...

Ticket ID: 546 Priority: Medium I tried all the xeon 3.0Ghz categories but cannot find one for Paxville, please add it or if it already exists show me the category, adding imageshack link for its cpuz screen.....\r\n\r\n

Ticket ID: 547 Priority: Low http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/quick-reference-guide-to-intel-integrated-graphics/\r\n\r\nPractically GMA4500 is the same with GMA X4500 but without MPEG2 decoding, HD Post Processing features or Intel® Clear Video Technology

Ticket ID: 545 Priority: High Add Please AMD Mobile 1800XP. Thanks.\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=697882

Ticket ID: 548 Priority: Low http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=818813\r\n\r\nThe videocard is GeForce 7950GX2 not GeForce MX 4000

Ticket ID: 544 Priority: Medium I have a T6670 Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile 2.20ghz CPU that I can bench for HWBot. It has not been added to the processor list. Could you add it?\r\nHere is my CPU-Z validation: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=693690\r\nThanks!

Ticket ID: 542 Priority: Medium please add a Pentium 3 866 Slot1. here is the cpu-z link http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=692997 but my board doesn\'t support 133fsb so cpu-z thinks it\'s a Pentium 3 650E. For that is this Screen http://img196.imageshack.us/content.php?page=done&l=img196/9569/p3866.jpg&via=mupload . The Specs are the same as the P3 866MHz Socket 370 just the package is different

Ticket ID: 538 Priority: Medium Hi\r\n\r\ni uploaded some result with the E6500(2,93GHz) CPu, but they go to the E6500K CPU.\r\n\r\nHope you can help me\r\n\r\nEiswolf93

Thanks for your consideration!

Ticket ID: 534 Priority: Low i have rerun a flagged entry, it was a bugged run.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=862347&popup=true

Ticket ID: 541 Priority: Medium

Ticket ID: 539 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=690643

...

Ticket ID: 540 Priority: High HD 4870 1G Gpu-Z:\r\nhttp://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/hyshn/

Ticket ID: 430 Priority: Low There are 2 categories of Opteron 248 in the Opteron .09-list, one called Opteron 248 and one called Opteron 248 .09. Only one is needed, I suggest you rename 248 to 248 .09, and delete the other one, which is empty \r\n\r\nAnother advice is to write 90nm/130nm instead of .09/.13, AFAIK most people use nm when they talk about this kind of stuff.\r\n\r\nThe 130nm category (or .13 if you wish) has some models where a 90nm part exists with the same model number. This can be a bit confusing, since the categories are labeled Opteron 242 etc (no process indentification), would be better if it was labeled Opteron 242 130nm and so on. (note t…