[Johnd0e - DDR4 SDRAM @ 2133.3MHz - 8642 points Geekbench3 Memory Performance Single Core]

Cpu is acting up. Had to quite early.

[LucikMucik - DDR3 SDRAM @ 2600MHz - 4767 points Geekbench3 Memory Performance Single Core]

Yes score should be 3769. Also it has been flagged as innacurate on primatelabs site. So its invalid anyways.

[ChentinoX - DDR3 SDRAM - 4392 points Geekbench3 Memory Performance Single Core]

Yes jpmboy, i dont even know were he got the 4392 from.

 

 

Edit:

 

Just noticed theres a second gb3 screenshot showing 4392 as mem score.....but but no cpuz tabs open.

[speed.fastest - DDR4 SDRAM @ 2010MHz - 8051 points Geekbench3 Memory Performance Single Core]

Dang i didnt even realize what board you were using haha. Good job man.

[kimandsally - Core i3 6100 @ 3810MHz - 699 marks XTU]

nice job!!!!

[New Version]

No hes being sarcastic becuase xtu is never truly "fixed".

[RULE - DDR4 SDRAM @ 4320MHz - 44230 MByte/sec. MaxxMem Read Bandwidth]

awsome!!! very good.

[mllrkllr88 - Radeon HD 6970 @ 1080/1550MHz - 9319 marks 3DMark11 - Performance]

Awsome job mllr!!

[Johnd0e - Core i3 6320 @ 5618MHz - 13339 points Geekbench3 - Multi Core]

Thanks guys! Cant wait to get more dice!

[joshy Ocuk - Core i7 6700K @ 6000MHz - 4min 56sec 750ms SuperPi - 32M]

***Removed by request so other cheaters don't know what to do.***

 

last edit:

mods can PM if interested

[marc0053 - Core i7 6700K @ 6500MHz - 1449 cb Cinebench - R15]

nice one marc!

[Vellinious - Radeon R9 290X @ 1310/1846MHz - 16005 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike]

i dont have a 290, but if i run this bench back to back with only changeing memory clock on my 980ti will that suffice in proving/disproving gains from memory clock in GT2?

[kimandsally - Core i3 6320 @ 4020MHz - 743 marks XTU]

Congrats! Finaly did it. Great job!

[Z97X SOC Force socket bracket]

Wow, awsome job on that. Looks fantastic, im sure many would want it.

[dhenzjhen - 3x Titan X Pascal @ 2050/1350MHz - 43404 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike]

Fantastic job.

[New Version]

I havent seen any real reason to use a newer version than 6.1.2.8

 

i agree though for me its 6.1.2.11 becuase i accidentaly installed it its been working fine, im just bored tonight so im binning xtu's hahaha have to beat you to that 744 somehow

[New Version]

the new XTU version is junk. using same settings i did 743 and numerous 742 on and my score is 587-589 marks.

 

what did they do, use a different portion of p95 stress test?

 

things i noticed different compared to previous versions are, active core count drops to 1 alot and cpu util drops to 20ish % alot.

 

 

in other news the AVX portion or whatever is still working, 103+ bclk still kills score.

[wiLLius - Core i7 6700K @ 4990MHz - 1715 marks XTU]

Great job!

[mllrkllr88 - Core i7 6700K @ 5400MHz - 1894 marks XTU]

dang gettin them points. looking good.

[marc0053 - Titan X Pascal @ 2115/3000MHz - 28218 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike]

nice job marc! having a blast with those TXP.

[The official Novice Nimble 12 Thread]

alritey then 5820k submitted.

[The official Novice Nimble 12 Thread]

Any response regarding the core division for stage 1 r15? Or are we going full out, most cores wins.

[marc0053 - Titan X Pascal @ 2115/2977MHz - 37677 marks 3DMark11 - Performance]

nice one marc great job!

[Johnd0e - Core i3 6320 @ 4900MHz - 552 cb Cinebench - R15]

thanks man! definetly an impressive kit, got really lucky.

[jpmboy - 2x Titan X Pascal @ 2101/5481MHz - 49327 marks 3DMark11 - Performance]

nice one jpm! awsome job.