Mikecdm
-
Posts
511 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Mikecdm
-
-
It seems that some of the staff has been informed of some of these tweaks and they themselves have been using them. Still, other staff members post regularly, asking the members to share the "tweaks" so that they can be properly evaluated. It seems odd that one staff member knows the tweaks and others don't.
-
If the wrapper makes it so that the bench is ran 100% legit and new scores don't come close to the scores that we are seeing, what does that say?
If these recent scores are legit, then they should be able to be duplicated or at the very least, come very close.
-
We bench for points and because we enjoy what we do. I like pcm05, but i do not like these tweaks. I don't like having to do all sorts of tweaks to get a score that comes close. I too have spent a decent amount on storage. It might not be in the thousands, but I do have an areca. It just sits on the shelf along with my acard since I won't participate in this fashion. I'd rather loose points than run pcm05 this way. I'll just stick to 3d. I might not be as efficient as others, but I can still come close when clocks are similar.
-
Moose, it's seems that you agree that PCM05 has become a joke and you are against what it has become. Why do you continue to run the bench if you feel this way about it? Too hard to pass up the easy boints?
-
So say someone makes a wrapper that works 100% and there is no way to cheat. What happens to the scores that have been showing up for the past couple of months?
-
Understood.
I don't play either.
I find it ironic that in the not so distant past, Optytrooper was labeled a PCM05 cheat for suspicion of using powertoy, that was never proven BTW, and what goes on now makes that look paltry in comparison. Now it's all high fives and "nice tweak" and nobody seems to think anythings wrong with that. It's bullsh1t.
I'm almost certain that many people see that it's wrong. I bet even the people doing it can see something wrong in it but they get away with it. Most people probably just don't give a shit and don't say anything. I just stopped running pcm05. I did it for team cup, but it was just for the competition points.
A few months ago I probably would have disagreed with your view on pcm05, but now I have to agree with you. It has become a joke.
-
Awesome cpu and amazing clocks.
-
Nice score, Every time i see someone using that OC formula, it makes me want one.
-
Good stuff, I need to learn this magic with my 260L.
-
I think we will see amazing efficiency.
-
Should just make it to where a flashed 465 has to be submitted as a 470. It makes things easier. When you unlock amd cpu, they compete in a different core class and an x3 555 never competes against an x2 555.
-
Does that mean it's time to share all secrets and let others catch up while you conjure up more magic to show off when you un-retire
-
I hate Overclocker who use stock clock....hehe
Unfortunately, clocks don't really matter any more in this bench
-
Killer scores, great job. Board looks very interesting too. Dual post code readouts, + - buttons, i like it.
-
Several of these classes, like the E2xxx, E3xxx, E5xxx no actual Core 2 cpu exist. They are either celeron or pentium dual core, but they are all based on the core 2 architecture and part of the core 2 family.
-
no...cant let u sub zero boys have all the FUN
Also..maxxmem link is down...
Its easier to get LN2 than it is to figure out the "tweaks" in pcmark05
-
-
247 bclk on an asus w/o slow mode, I'm amazed.
-
At first none were caps, then i thought it might be the problem, but I didn't realize that the M was supposed to be capitalized.
I also forgot to thank CherV for sharing, Thank you.
-
I do that, but when i launch the flash dekstops, it lowers TW. Not sure whats going on.
So it turns out, I didn't spell PCMark05 exactly as it should. I didn't capitalize the M, once i did that it worked.
-
it seems i can't get this flashdesktops 2 to do anything.
-
All these crazy scores are impressive, but it's only a 2-3 person game right now and one person is just playing with the rest of them. I'm honestly not even shocked when i see the big numbers because i know he's holding back. Unfortunately I don't know how to even begging trying to find out these tweaks. I try to decrypt the little hints here and there, look over the web to see if i can find anything to head me in the right direction, but the registry is written in hieroglyphics.
-
skip the 80k and 90k, just show us 100k.
-
Lots of tweaking there, very nice job. Wish I could do half of that stuff. Maybe Pro finally brings out the 80k today.
Clarification in PCMark'05 about Tweaks // Tricks allowed
in Benchmark software
Posted
In 3d benches, when the screen goes black and you get a boosted, we consider that a glitch and an invalid score. How is it any different when we use flash2desktops? The screen goes black for the duration of the Transparent windows test and we get a boosted score.