Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

BeepBeep2

Members
  • Posts

    407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BeepBeep2

  1. I have one but I don't know if it works or not and I can't test it, I would be happy to sell it to you in the future if I can test it again and bench what I need to with it.

     

    Chances are you will find one by then though.

  2. Your Giga is nothing less than amazing!!! I didn't have lucky with those IGP's, my Biostar TA785GE (R.I.P :() does 1080 1.55V on HD4200, not that great...:(

     

    I will change the thermal paste of the NB heatsink, if i'm not mistaken, i never have replaced on this card and it's quite "old" (4 years) so is probably to get moar MHz only doing this xD

    I'm just afraid to push voltages on the NB...not sure what the safe limit is.

  3. Gigabyte 890GX board here

     

    3x CPU-Z makes a BSOD after '06 run when I try to drag the results window to get it out of the way of run settings

    3x CPU-Z + GPU-Z instant BSOD

    2x CPU-Z + GPU-Z + '06 fails

     

    GPU-Z 0.6.2 and 6.3 do not start, I had to use 0.4.5

     

    The BSODs are related to the GPU driver, I think it is a hardware issue though as usually when unstable VPU Recover works. Whatever it is, it doesn't like whatever these programs are doing, accessing something...

     

    Basically I can not comply with the rules with this setup. I don't know how other people pulled it off, but two of my former results were reported and blocked for the same reason, because I had this problem 2 years ago when these were new.

     

    It might just be a problem with this specific board, but I can't get it to work.

     

    Happens on XP, Vista, and 7.

     

    I can open CPU-Z CPU and mem...

    I have a valid key so I guess I can get the validation however this is really frustrating.

     

    Back 2 years ago, when GPU-Z was still required, all GPU-Z read was manufacturer and GPU name, clocks were all 0 MHz, it was useless anyway.

     

    Anyway, I'm gonna submit what I can, which will probably be without GPU-Z in which case I'll post pics of my setup with it I guess. The results are inline with other results efficiency wise.

  4. Well the difference is akin to an HD4870 vs HD4890...

    The "M" part is a 400 MHz part vs the 533 MHz "MHD" part, and the chipset is GL/GS40 based, not GM45 like the part you linked above. My laptop has a GL40 chipset.

     

    The GPU-Z validation was trash as GPU-Z doesn't detect these parts correctly.

     

    If you don't feel it should be added I can understand I guess, since it would be a new set of team points however these are different parts...

     

    RTEmagicC_4500_table_03.gif.gif

    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2442646

    2442646.png

  5. http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_ii_x2_210e/

     

    These are all runs done by myself for my team, they didn't show up in our "New Team Submissions" tab. ...

     

    Also, as far as I can see, my team lost two team total points from before I submitted them to after...and I was watching our points total closely the night I ran them and I didn't see any gain AFAIK. Unfortunately I wasn't watching power points... >_<

     

     

    Thanks,

    Sam :)

  6. I have a laptop with 4500M, and I'd like to enter it into Team Cup :)

    ...Or should I submit under MHD? This is a 400 MHz lower bin iGPU instead of 533 or whatever the "HD" variant is. Due to the (lack of) overclockability there is for laptop parts I feel like it would be a little unfair to have to go up against the faster/higher binned parts.

     

    Thanks,

    Sam

×
×
  • Create New...