psynapse

Quite possibly not. I guess I'm just thinking more from an OO design purist point of view. It's a good test of sound design and correct pattern adherence for code modules to be independently portable. The other thing to consider is longevity of the code assets. There's a bit of debate about the future of WPF and Silverlight given what people have seen of Windows 8 and how Microsoft has been shunting teams around. We just wouldn't want to couple any model functionality with a specific UI implementation...

If you architect this properly, it should be possible to use the same model and view model source to target not only a Windows build, but also Android and iPhone (using MonoDroid and MonoTouch respectively). I've done it for MonoDroid. I'm also happy to use my GitHub account to host it, though there's no real need - GitHub is free for open source projects.

I can help. Using Blend to generate the XAML isn't my strong point, but I can make it functional if someone else can make it pretty. I'd also recommend hosing it on GitHub. It's infinitely better source control than SVN.

Yeah; there's potential. I had hoped to bench it colder, but ended up having to move some gear for cash. The chip and the board were included.

Thanks mate

Yes it is. Here's a CPUZ: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=848117 Cheers.

Ticket ID: 710 Priority: Low Please add Core i7 Q720

Experiencing the same here...

Have a look at 3D01 multi card scores (might be others too). My result in listings says 9ish. Expand the score and it switches to 2ish. My total score is with the lower number.

Result submitted. Thanks bud.

Error follows. Tried several times on different machines. Error message java.lang.NullPointerException: null Error stack trace org.hwbot.facade.ResultFacadeImpl.createResult line 477 sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor540.invoke line -1 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke line 25 java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke line 597 org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection line 307 org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint line 182 org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed line 149 org.springframework.aop.interceptor.JamonPerformanceMonitorInterceptor.invokeUnderTrace line 105 org.springframework.aop.interceptor.AbstractTraceInterceptor.invoke line 110 org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed line 171

I can't get a validation with my current setup either. I'm also using 1.51. I get no errors or corruption messages, just the big red cross and a message at the top saying rejceted by CPUZ 1.51 I've noticed a lot of these lately and I never noticed it before new version.

New team member created another 411 by mistake, instead of joining the extant one. Request to delete the new 411 resulted in a deletion of the old 411. Doh! It's all in hand. Should be rectified soon.