Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Strunkenbold

Crew
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2209

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Strunkenbold

    Socket 479 Hall of Fame

    in Old School

    Posted · Edited by Strunkenbold

    May i ask also , why do we have in this list , socket P results ?

     

    Its because the T9400 has accidentally the wrong socket in DB, opened a new ticket for this. Should be correct if Antinomy agrees to my changes and Massman update this list.

     

    Edit: But its still funny to see how Hipro5 humiliates those Core2 Cpus... :D

    Socket 479 fixes

    in Support

    Posted · Edited by Strunkenbold

    Move to BGA479:

    Celeron M 205

    Celeron M 215

    Celeron M 310

    Celeron M 318

    Celeron M 353

    Celeron M 373

    Celeron M 800Mhz

    Core 2 Duo U2400

    Core 2 Duo U2500

    Core L2300 (1.5Ghz)

    Core L2400 (1.66Ghz)

    Core L2500 (1.83Ghz)

    Pentium M 758

    Pentium M 753

    Pentium M 738

    Pentium M 723

    Pentium M 733

    Pentium M 733J

    Pentium M 773

    Pentium M 778

    Pentium M LV 1.1 GHz

    Pentium M LV 1.2 GHz

    Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718)

    Pentium M ULV 0.9 GHz

    Pentium M ULV 1.0 GHz

    Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713)

     

    Move to BGA953:

    Core 2 Duo SU2300

    Core 2 Duo SU2700

    Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz)

    Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz)

    Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz)

    Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz)

    Core Solo U1300 (1.06Ghz)

    Core Solo U1400 (1.2Ghz)

    Core Solo U1500 (1.33Ghz)

     

    Move to Socket P:

    Core 2 T9400 (2.53Ghz)

     

    Rename:

    Pentium M LV 1.1 Ghz to Pentium M 1.1Ghz LV

    Pentium M LV 1.2 Ghz to Pentium M 1.2Ghz LV

    Pentium M LV 1.3 GHz (718) to Pentium M 1.3Ghz LV (718)

    Pentium M ULV 0.9 Ghz to Pentium M 900Mhz ULV

    Pentium M ULV 1.0 Ghz to Pentium M 1.0Ghz ULV

    Pentium M ULV 1.1 GHz (713) to Pentium M 1.1Ghz ULV (ULV)

    Core 2 U3300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3300 (1.2Ghz)

    Core 2 U3500 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Solo SU3500 (1.4Ghz)

    Core 2 U9300 (1.2Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9300 (1.2Ghz)

    Core 2 U9400 (1.4Ghz) to Core 2 Duo SU9400 (1.4Ghz)

    Core L2300 (1.5Ghz) to Core Duo L2300 (1.5Ghz)

    Core L2400 (1.66Ghz) to Core Duo L2400 (1.66Ghz)

    Core L2500 (1.83Ghz) to Core Duo L2500 (1.83Ghz)

    Celeron M 350 to Celeron M 350 B1

    Celeron M 350J to Celeron M 350J B1

    Celeron M 360 to Celeron M 360 B1

    Celeron M 360J to Celeron M 360J C0

    Pentium M 715 to Pentium M 715 B1

    Pentium M 715A to Pentium M 715A C0

    Pentium M 725 to Pentium M 725 B1

    Pentium M 725A to Pentium M 725A C0

    Pentium M 735 to Pentium M 735 B1

    Pentium M 735A to Pentium M 735A C0

     

    Merge:

    Pentium M 745 and Pentium M 745A

    As its seems that there are also C0 revisions of M 745, there is no way to distinguish.

     

    Hope everything is right...

    The official GIGABYTE BIG XTU Challenge Round 1: Z97 2 cores thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    Why not run several programs at once guys :)

     

    That was the first thing I thought of but running a second program side by side is crashing the benchmark process. You really have to extremely reduce bclk and tweak to steal some cpu cycles with programs without letting XTU crash. Taking into account that one run takes up to one hour this was for sure the hardest stage of the competition.

    Socket A/462 Hall of Fame

    in Old School

    Posted

    Maybe filter subs which does not bring hw points, so there won't be entries with the same cpu model from the same user, but with different score. Better take just the best entry with a given cpu.

     

    Yup agree here, should be really only best user result. A Top10 is to short for multiple entrys by same user.

     

    BTW, did anyone looked at first spot in 3dm01? 2700k misinterpreted as Athlon 2700+! :D

    Some love for Old School Hardware?

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    I'm sorry to hear you are disappointed with our efforts.

    Im not disappointed of your efforts, its quite the opposite! I expected nothing, not a single response but now we have 2 threads full with people showing interest and this led to a new competition series, not bad huh?

     

    If anything, Im a little bit disappointed that _I_ cant properly explain you why such a ranking system could be great fun. (and I failed very hard, as it seems that nobody understood my first post at all) I still thinking main advantages would be:

    -cheap parts

    -_almost_ no binning requirement

    -relies mostly on benchers skill

     

    I just thought that this would be an interesting concept, it could be a tribute to the golden days of OC and maybe we even can involve people left the scene already some time ago to return. Maybe they just need a platform again to show their skills.

    But I have to admit, I didnt thought it would be so hard to implement this. I totally understand that this have to wait till Devs have some room to breath.

     

    As an alternative, wouldnt it be possible to create such HOF rankings like you did with the 5Ghz sp32m challenge?

    So saying, creating a thread for i.e. Socket 462 and include Top20 for CPU-Z, SP1m, SP32m, Pifast, wp32, wp1024 and so on?

    Some love for Old School Hardware?

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    Maybe I've got you wrong about the competition. And being realistic another ranking is over the top. Too many of them as for me, I only use the hardware masters one.

     

    If I red it correctly, Massman is just about to introduce yet another league anyway to motivate some youngster. This raises the question what does Massman to motivate people which are already some years in the game and dont want to become the master of CPU binning for Xtreme League or like to bench 100 different Socket 775 CPUs on LN2 for TopSpot in Hardware League.

    Also we should consider that we already have a separated ranking in the bot, its called "Mobile Masters League". Is it over the top to create another menu point and accumulating some specific points together and call it Old School League?

    But I try to be realistic, I was surprised about the response this threat got, I mean we have monthly competitions back which is very cool! But also knew that Massman wont spend coding time for old stuff which no sponsor is interesting in.

    Some love for Old School Hardware?

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    How would an oldschool ranking be different than the hardware masters? In order to do well in Hardware Masters you usually are using lots of old school tech, unless you mean to restrict the amount of subs like in XOC and such.

     

    Sorry but thats exactly the point, benching oldschool stuff doesnt do anything in hardware league. You can bench Socket 7 Systems forever, do crazy mods spend LN2 on it and get 100 pts in the end. Because benching that stuff awards you with 2pts in the best case, this is dedication for sure but to gain ground you have to own a good 4770k/4790k go to ebay and buy Geforce 8800 or similar. Last time I got a Radeon 5850 for cheap. I didnt even had to fire up my soldering iron or install a waterblock still I got 20pts. Dont get me wrong, I know these points are cheap to get and will lower with every new CPU generation.

    To stay on top you have to do some really good CPU, mainly Socket 775 results but benching all the real old stuff is mainly for the team.

    So thats why I had the idea for a separate ranking system. Introducing a Hall of Fame page for each socket would be the first step. You could award top positions with badges, which appear on users profile page but real competition comes with points!

    Some love for Old School Hardware?

    in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions

    Posted

    Hey its very cool that this really happened. I would like to thank anybody involved with this. Although I actually didnt want to re establish the monthly competition series I appreciate the work made by the mods. My intention was to add a separate oldschool ranking to the bot. Seems I either didnt explained it correctly or its just unrealistic because of the huge coding work.

     

    When I could add something to Round 1 of Competition:

    We should maybe think about lift the limitations a bit to reach people participate because of "show & shine" factor. Not everyone has exactly the hardware needed lying around or wants to ebaying. So it may be a good idea to allow Geforce 1-4 also and sockets appeared prior S478 and S939. They wont have big chances to win but atleast they can participate.

    Superpi 1m 2801Mhz Cap is a nice idea but it could also be interesting when you add a full out stage. Socket 478 standing no chance against S939...

    Intel 815 db fixes

    in Support

    Posted

    Just came across this:

    Shouldnt be Asus Cusl2, Cusl2-M, Tusl2 and ST6E be 815E instead of 815?

    And Abit ST6 be 815EP?

    Atleast on my Cusl2 I can verify that it uses ICH2 and therefore should be 815E.

    Soyo 6BE+

    in Support

    Posted

    Could you add SY-6BE+? I actually have a CPU verification, but it doesnt show any information in the mainboard tab.

     

    Also there seems to be something wrong in our db, I cant find a SY-6BE+ III mainboard in the net but there is a SY-6BA+ III, might be just a typo.

     

    Last but not least, could you rename: 6BA+IV to SY-6BA+ IV.

     

    Again thx. :)

    The official GIGABYTE Z97 - X99 BIG XTU Challenge thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    I think I got it now, seems you just have to wait before someone do the right score. Then you just bench till you match the same. Ofcourse it could help being the first reaching the score because you may get an advantage when there is a tie in the end (and there will be a tie...) but when I look in the rules: "if two participants hit the same target starting from the earliest target the one with the earliest submission wins" (means, when you were too late in Target 03-03 you have already lost)

    So thx Intel preventing lots of people to take part in this competition because they use their non-english Windows variant. Actually I would say to place somewhere a big fat headline to let people know how they can fix their XTU but on the other hand you cant win anymore this one so maybe Intel will simply fix XTU before we need this temperature function somewhere in the future again.

    The official GIGABYTE Z97 - X99 BIG XTU Challenge thread.

    in HWBOT Competitions

    Posted

    The target hits are now obfuscated until the end of the competition. Achill3us, that's correct.

     

    attachment.php?attachmentid=2798&stc=1&d=1425342854

     

    Its still very obvious which score is the correct one, as they appear in the ranking first. So maybe you should rank by score.

     

    I still dont know if I should trust this, afterwards some say "it was just a bug, target was different". (In terms of bugs, you can never trust the bot) ;)

×
×
  • Create New...