George_o/c
-
Posts
796 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by George_o/c
-
-
Oh so it works fine then even in Windows 7? Nice I have to test some PCMark 04 as well with my 2600k
-
Oh i haven't tried it on win7, so I don't know if it works 100%. Have you tried running it as administrator? I've only tested this app on XP.
-
You need to set one core affinity when grammar is loading and then re-set affinity to all cores when the next test is loading
I made this video back in December with my old-dog 2005 camera. I should use camtasia studio next time and upload a better quality video!
-
voted for yay as well
-
try this
-
-
-
Why does the vendor say Sapphire?
-
Yeah you always have to do that in 3DMark01 if you want to max out every single subtest. Also aim for the good run in Car High and Car Low, try different subtest order, different LODs for each test etc etc
I will try soon with better CPU and same clocks on the VGA! Then it's time for the card @ SS at -40*C
But yeah I will always remember this 100k run, I think it's very efficient for the clocks, especially since the card doesn't have voltage mods -
Why having to make the score into seconds so that to post it Pieter? Why did you change the old 32M submission system, I think it was much simpler!
-
I see you worked out your memory problems with the proper mods
-
348 years ???I guess they will be well prepared !:D:D:D
hahahah you filthy spammer
-
I thought you hated Pi Vince
What about some 32M action heh? -
You got about 2MHz bclk from air to SS right? Yeap that seems about normal
-
I hear that 41k is done...
-
Ok.... whats your secret to Pixel Shader? 4550FPS?
Heh you gotta love this benchmark
You need to tune that XP Startup better George, 160 is unacceptable!
-
Well done George! I know there's more in that setup, push it to the limits!
-
Make sure you do that
I have exams now so I cant push more, but I'll try again after the 25th. I'll try Hypers as well and see if I have any luck -
Yeap but I've tried everything and still can't run tRCD 9. I've tried Beta BIOSes, I've tried to much I/O (VTT) voltage, subtimings tweaking, everything! Maybe it's my RAMs, who knows?
-
Hey Scunny, did you have problems running tRCD 9 with this board?
-
Nature @ 735/1020MHz, the rest @ 700/1000MHz
-
Also splman's score is on 1866 divider.
http://hwbot.org/submission/2176708_splmann_2_superpi_32m_core_i7_2600k_5min_59sec_922ms 1866 (1:7) divider
-
Why nobody reads the rules?
http://hwbot.org/submission/2176871_tol0108_superpi_32m_core_i5_2500k_6min_34sec_510ms 2133 (1:8) divider
-
Dude you are running at 2133MHz divider... It's stated in the rules only to use the 1066MHz (1:4) divider!
dinos22 - Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 6516MHz - 6sec 281ms SuperPi
in Result Discussions
Posted
It's a well known bug that previous HWBOT revision used to have. It doesn't happen anymore, but all these "small" screenshots must be replaced again