Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

George_o/c

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    795

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by George_o/c

    Invalid Super PI results - why/how?

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    That's why in case the validation of xs is not working (it's been some time now ...), we make a nice screenshot with CPU-Z and if you want memset ... ;) Nobody's gonna tell you anything if you do that ;):)

     

    For example, how on earth can someone know that this SPi 1M run of yours, is an outcome of an E8500 and not a QX9650 for example ... ? :)

     

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706152

     

    Take a look at my screenie for example ... ;)

     

    signaturesh2.jpg

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 no resolution

     

    Holy shit ! This guy's 3D Marks have no resolution AT ALL ... :eek: So, that means that he could have faked them all by not using the standard benchmark resolution ? ... :eek::D

     

    And what about rest of the results reported ? :|

     

    I think you 'll have to wait like all of us do ... :( They have to compete with a huuuuuge amount of results, unfortunately ...

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    It will create a mess with all those lists, but it's not silly. The penalty for using agp cards is huge, as you can't use the hottest CPUs etc. WHich means that no-one with the agp version will be able to compete for the top scores. Which means that a new category MUST be created to make things fair:)

     

    It's been a while now, and I haven't seen a new category for X1650 pci-e :(

     

    I'd also like to add some pretty-messed up results :

     

    GeForce 6800 GS (NV40) AGP category

    http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=911

     

    ALL THE AM3 RESULTS POSTED IN THAT CATEGORY, ARE DONE WITH PCI-E 6800GS VGAs ... I don't know if all these guys are THAT confused, that they can not tell which is the PCI-E and which is the AGP category, but they are in the wrong category !

     

    GeForce 6800 GS (NV42) AGP category

    http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1268

     

    Well, there is only one guy benching this specific card ... But guess what ? He managed to bench two 6800GS AGP VGAs in SLi ... :P He's clearly mistaken, it's pretty damn obvious ;) Maybe because, the NV42 core is both in AGP and in PCI-E 6800GSs ;)

     

    Thus, could someone move them plz ?

     

    Thank you :)

    George

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    George_o/c

    It is not told anywhere which it is a category. It is written only 1650. And who exactly it is not right, you or I are precisely not known. To divide all categories on AGP \PCI it is simply silly

     

    Thanks a lot ... :P Firstly you are playing unfair by posting with a PCI-E VGA, to an AGP category (come on dude, you know it's unfair, but you pretend everything's right, god damn' it ! :mad:), and secondly you indirectly call me silly ... :D

     

    I let knopflerbruce speak for myself ;):)

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ...

     

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993

     

    I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones ;)

     

    Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated :

     

    anywayze7.png

     

    I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw ;) Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... ;)

     

    Please ! Somebody has to take that into consideration ... It's another card ... :mad:

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    All right Nordling ... I'm telling you we have different cards ... Don't make me angry now, it's so simple ... X1650 AGP and X1650 PCI-E ARE DIFFERENT ! I didn't implement that you posted results done with a X1650 Pro, but that you are in the wrong category ... ;) In my defense when I saw that there is no proper category for my X1650 AGP I PMed Bwanasoft and he created it ... Why don't you do the same thing, so that a new X1650 PCI-E category is created ? ... :)

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ...

     

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993

     

    I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones ;)

     

    Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated :

     

    anywayze7.png

     

    I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw ;) Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... ;)

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Take a look at this P4 3GHz Northwood SPi 1M done by NoOsPhErE ...

    http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506020

     

    It's the top SPi for that cpu category ... Now looking at it, it seemed really weird as F.O.G.N.A who has the second SPi 1M place ... He managed to get 30 seconds with the cpu at almost 5GHz ... But NoOsPhErE, managed to do 29 seconds with his cpu at only 4350MHz ... Isn't it a little weird ? Of course it is ;)

     

    Take a look at NoOsPhErE' s validation (well not validation, it's a link to forumpost ;)) ... This specific SPi 1M time was done with a Pentium D 830 @ 4350MHz ... It's a dualcore, and the ram is of course DDR2 ... http://www.techzonept.com/showpost.php?p=696467

     

    How is that validation possible ? It's pretty damn obvious that he is using a different cpu, as it's also clearly stated in the link to forumpost ...

    Wrong Result

    in Submission & member moderation

    Posted

    Well, for the past month I've noticed several results that look suspicious ... Some of 'em are totally irrational, makes me wanna laugh ! ... :D

     

    1) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665503

    9225 GFX score with a 7200GS 64MB ... That much score seems to be done with a 7600GT or other relevant VGAs ... But not with a 7200GS, for sure ;)

     

    2) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662387

    2 x 7200GS on an Asrock P4VM890 ... LoL ! :D But that mobo has only 1 x PCI Express x16 slot ... How on h3ll did he fit two of 'em there ? :D And even if it was true (which is obviously not !), he gets only 400 marks more than the above-mentioned score done with the same hardware ? For Christ's shake ! ...

     

    I've got more of 'em ... ;)

     

    3) 7200GS 128MB :http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684065 Harleybro managed to get 35463 AM3 score, with a QX9650 @ 4.6GHz and a weak 7200GS 128MB @ 622/901 ... Nice score, perfectly rational, if the setup is taken into consideration (Congrats Harleybro btw ! ;))

     

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669397

    manos444444 manages to get 58485 AM3 score with a P4 3.0GHz @ 3MHz (he is clearly mistaken, 3GHz was what he should write) and a stock 7200GS ...

     

    Compare these two scores ... I think manos's score is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay weird ... (:D). I think you got it ;)

     

    4) Same guy, again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665908 Totally weird 7200GS 256MB AM3 score ...

     

    I think that the specific hwbot user, found an easy way of getting points ... Running some AM3 benches with his hardware, uploads the screen shot mentioning that he uses a 7200GS ... all of 'em 64MB, 128MB, 256MB ... Maybe because the number of users benching with a 7200GS is small, thus he though it's an "easy" category ... Not smart enough, I should say ... :D Especially the SLi setup, with an Asrock mobo that has only one PCI-E x16 slot ... ROFL ! :D

     

    5) Again ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=676076 Same user ... 9.5k AM3 score with a 5100 Go ? (LOoooOL :D) That card performs like 600 GFX score only ... ;) He uses the same core/mem frequencies in all of his entries (400/400) when the correct 5100 Go freqs are 300/600 ...

     

    6) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685758

    He has neither a verification image, nor a verification image url, nor a futuremark url ... Therefore, how is his score confirmed ? Moreover he uses an n-Vidia 8800GTX, but his entry is in the 5100 Go category ... That's why the second 3D 01 5100 Go score is 70k lower ;)

×
×
  • Create New...