-
Posts
550 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by El Gappo
-
-
AWESOME result m8! Really having your way with these biostar boards aren't you
________
-
-
-
-
-
No chillers allowed!
-
Would be very hard/impossible to boot into windows with any current chip at 2000mhz ram.
________
-
-
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/975901_blackwarriors_superpi_athlon_ii_x2_255_15sec_730ms
This is still happening. Reported a few but they don't seem to go lol. The cpu-z info clearly shows a 955 not a 255.
________
-
-
-
-
Got over 5.4 but I used the wrong cpu-z Will have a proper crack at this soon.
________
-
Cheers man. Couldn't find my bloody 5.3.cvf file so this will have to do until I go at it again. This chip is going to be a beast at spi
________
-
-
Did notice some of the submissions got removed but most of them are still there Do all of them have to be reported?
________
-
For example a 965 becomes a athlon II 265 when cores are disabled http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=900338 That is my own validation and i haven't submitted it. You can tell via the cpu psn and description that it is a 965 and als the fact a 265 doesn't exsist is kind of a giveaway
Although this is locking cores rather than unlocking cores I do think it is unethical to create boints for yourself but this has been a problem on hwbot for a while, in my opinion unlocked cpu's should have thier own categories to avoid domination in their original categories by people who just got lucky.
jmke It is possible (although not the issue at hand) that most single threaded benchmarks would benefit from this due to a reduction in heat and power consumption, but results in the 965 category showing an athlon II would constantly get reported and deleted. Yet another reason why they should have their own catergory.
edit: started typing this after post 3, you stole my thunder
and of course this means all athlon categories with corresponding model numbers need checking through, for example 955=255 940=240? etc etc tri's and quads should pull off this little trick
________
-
-
Ticket ID: 671
Priority: Medium
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Athlon%20II%20X2%20235e%20-%20AD235EHDK23GQ%20(AD235EHDGQBOX).html much appreciated
________
-
maybe instead of merging them you should leave the second category for the new c3 stepping. just a thought
________
-
Ticket ID: 509
Priority: High
my verification http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=674126 would be gratefull as im entering a competition http://www.amd.com/uk/products/desktop/processors/phenom-ii/Pages/phenom-ii-model-number-comparison.aspx
________
Should HWBot be divided into a two class structure?
in HWBOT Development: bugs, features and suggestions
Posted · Edited by El Gappo
I've kept my mouth shut thus far in these debates because although I like the idea I can't see it working. There are many flaws in the es argument, one being that AMD do not even mark their es samples clearly and they aren't recognizable in cpu-z screens etc. People lie.. But your unlikely-to-happen comment made my brain fart;
What if there was a separate points system that showed up on your profile like globals do but were awarded for "fastest retail sample" or "fastest dice run" "fastest air run" etc? Not effecting overall points or team points because it's to easy to cheat, just points to take pride in. It would be nice for users like myself that cannot get ln2 but still pride themselves on getting the highest results in a given cooling category or on a certain stepping Maybe not even points, just a medal or cup.
I think rev 3.5 was a step in the right direction allowing you to search for the highest cooling results. Maybe add retail and es to the filter options also?
There are plenty of ways to do it without splitting up the community. Who wants to be king of the amateurs? =/
________
Creampie Granny