1Day
-
Posts
601 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by 1Day
-
-
Sorry I forgot to mention that. UD7 tiborr, we are both running UD7 motherboards. I am on BIOS F7a and he is using F6x.
5.288 is Vantage stable and Wprime 1024 or anything else I toss at it. But no one MHz more.
-
Air, water or Dry Ice it matters not my CPU does not budge beyond 5.288GHz. My husband has the same batch and the same problem. Only difference his CPU will do 5.288 @1.460 volts mine needs over 1.5 for 53x multi.
So ebay it goes and next....
-
Not a stress my friend. GHZ is indeed a moderator. Only moderators can block results.
On the 27 October this announcement was posted on the front page for all HWBOT members to take note of and to comply with.
Important: screenshot verification mandatory for all submissionsDear Overclocking Community,
This small news post is to inform you that the general HWBOT benchmark verification rules have been updated.
“As of November 1st, it is mandatory to accompany every score submission with a verification screenshot. This screenshot must suffice to the specific verification requirements of each benchmark. One exception: for CPU-Z validations, a screenshot is not necessary”
This rule has been added after an inquiry from various sources. This rule will mainly affect benchmarks such as 3DMark Vantage and PCMark.
Best regards,
The HWBOT Staff.
-
No it is not enough and what has your submission got to do with GHz = nothing. It is about you. Maybe you should have started a discussion about yourself.
-
Please re-read the rules about PCMARK Vantage submissions. A valid FutureMark ORB link is acceptable in lieu of a screen shot.
FlashG
No it is not.
This was front page news and first posted on the 27th Oct 2010
Important: screenshot verification mandatory for all submissionsDear Overclocking Community,
This small news post is to inform you that the general HWBOT benchmark verification rules have been updated.
“As of November 1st, it is mandatory to accompany every score submission with a verification screenshot. This screenshot must suffice to the specific verification requirements of each benchmark. One exception: for CPU-Z validations, a screenshot is not necessary”
This rule has been added after an inquiry from various sources. This rule will mainly affect benchmarks such as 3DMark Vantage and PCMark.
Best regards,
The HWBOT Staff.
Flash could you please not create a thread to discuss a member when what you wish to discuss has nothing to do with that member.
It would have been far better to simply start a thread expressing your inquiry about the rules.
And you are quite correct the rules do need updating and they will be.
However the new Rev of HWBOT is the primary focus of most of the development and BOT mantainence staff. A benchmark that does not impact of either global nor hardware points is understandably low on their list of priorities at this time.
So please bare with us and submit your scores with a full and comprehensive screen. Remember more information is better than the barest minimum. -
-
Might be a good idea to join a local benching forum - are they still happening in SA?
-
if its reproducible then its not a bug...
most of you guys did awesome in maxmem
Quite right on both counts.
Congratulations to all the participants and well done to the winning team.
-
bugged run? Tweaked run ?
-
I agree different models
-
So basically it could be any three kits of ram even if they are the same model as long as they are different rev? For example Corsair had two or three different GT 2000MHz 7-8-7 kits. If I have understood correctly all submissions from one team with those same kit (different revision) are good.
Interesting.
-
I guess it is like stamp collection I never saw the point of that but many people love it = and like stamp collecting it does no harm.
Here is mine L040B307
#2458 5.288 GHz
-
MM have you got past that point yet. I stick exact same frequency.
-
Stage 1? You sure it is not the last stage you mean?
-
Result is valid.
-
so Far, The Debug Codes I'm Most Familiar With Are: 00, 25, 63 And Ae.
You are not alone
:D:D -
All I did was reinstall the BIOS had to do it 3 times before it took. Or before it made any difference.
Make sure that you set your vcore to 1.400 or higher depending on your CPU or it will not post at 5GHz, the other stuff is on auto at this point.
Go into your CPU options and set the PLL overvoltage 'hidden' option that this bios provides.
That was it.
-
ud7 not as expected ...can boot at 48 multi but even if I adjust the bclk by 101 ...windows will lockup already ...new bios for ud7 please
Yip me too at first but I found that I needed to get the right amount ratio of vcore and pll.
Once I had that I was able to play at 50+ and also move my BLK up and down.
Now it is time to sleep.
-
I think it is allowed as the BOT is accepting results posted with the CPU's.
-
-
The result was scanned by the BOT back when we used to have forum submissions. That is why you can not see any verification image.
Orignally that was how we used to submit for ranking, we would post our results on forums and a bot would come every day or so and update. And that is why this database is called HWBOT Hard Ware BOT
Bit of history
-
Thank you.
-
Could you give a bit more information please. Things like what benchmark you are running.
-
Cold testing?
in Sandy Bridge (P67/Z68) OC
Posted
I think it is CPU at this point. Mainly because I have not had a CPU that can do better and we only have the two boards which are the same to test on. Would be willing to test this theory with a 5.700GHz SB is anyone wishes to send to me.
:D