miker2ka

gg, welcome to hwbot

GG. Now you can go for 743

But you are close at least?

I thought i couldn't hit 1215 on 6600 because of my ram. I got a new kit but still @ 4120 12.11.11 i'm still nowhere. I hit between 1204-1207, and can't understant why...

Update: With settings above 1111 is the new max on 6500 With 6600 i'm nowhere near the top score.

Multumesc, nici eu nu credeam

Settings also works for 743. For 1043 same settings except speed step (must be on). All 3 CPUs were run with performance power plan. For 1110 was different: C-states off Speed step on Fclk 400 Bclk 103 if cpu can handle (if not 102.97) Power plan BALANCED (dunno why but was more consistent) For every CPU you can tweak from regedit: EnablePrefetcher 1 (default is 3) I added Enable Superfetch and set value 1(default is 0) Every 2-3 hours delete content of c:\windows\prefetch and restart As for time needed i got results in : 699 - 30 hours 743 - 8 hours 1043 - 20 minutes (i retested and got another 2 scores 20 min each) 1110 - 3 hours 1215- coming soon (at least i hope )

Got the bunnyer ....... 699.... weeee. I used XTU 6.0.2.14. Win 10 32bit N LTSB. (All updates except the one from july 2017) FCLK 1000 and BCLK 102.95. C-States enabled. RAM 12-11-11-28-1 220 50-51/7-7 Microcode 2D Clockgen divider 12 pll ort 32 cold bug killer 1.8 AFD 3.0.92.1 Bios L1.31 vccpll 2.5 Thanks to @Alex@ro @mllrkllr88 @Luumi and everyone who posted here.

Running nuts here... With bllk .97 i get lower scores than .93. I switched to w8 pro 32 9200 and i can't even hit 698. (And same like w10 ltsb with c-states on i get better scores...) What m i missing?

Around 1x698 every 40 minutes is constant enough?

Over 20x698....

I also tried 6.0.2.7 and 6.1.2.11 and got 698 with both... still no 699

I use 6.0.2.8. Think this is the right one. Maybe is just a matter of pacience. 743 was hit with this version. Maybe someone can tell us about other cpu settings like cstates , speed step, cpu amplitude, slew step or rate. E.g. with c states on i get consistent higher scores.

The AFD in this post shoud work. But it only worked for me with settings above and microcode 2d. And 698 is preatty rare. I hit it 5 times in about 400 runs.

@Alan_Alberino, ty for afd. Should 102.9375 blck with ram 12-11-11-28 220 1T 50/51 7/7 give me 699 eventualy? I can't get to bclk 102.97, it crashes. Max i can get is 102.95. And clockgen voltage is clk vdd? And how can i get ram to boot 50/51 every time? With 102.93 it's a bunny. I managed to boot 50/51 with 102 and raise to 102.93-102.95 with afd

I can get ram to 12-11-11-28 220 1t. Rtl 50/51 sometimes. Dunno how to set them to be 50/51 every boot

Think XTU doesn't like bclk 103. I managed to boot but xtu reads 100 C on CPU and the score is bad... arround 200 marks. Is there a way to put bclk slightly under 103?

What do you mean by "special afd"?

I got 697 on win 10 enterprise ltsb 32. Now i tried pro and i get max 694.. next bclk lvl in afd is 103... and it's unstable. If i get 695 often and 697 rarely am i on the path to 699? Or i shoud get like 697 often to hope for 699?

Got it to work with another version of formula drive. Now im stuck at 696. Are the pll ort and divider settings good? And what microcode is ok to use? Or it doesn't matter?

If i have formula drive installed when i boot os it resets bclk to 100. If i change bclk from os i get instat crash.

Just got myself a MOCF, and trying to get 699 marks on 6100. CPU can handle 4000 12-11-11 tight. But i cannot make it run the multiplier x 37 with 102.80 + bclk. Except RAM setting i tried : C-states disabled Clockgen divider 12 pll ort 32 cold bug killer 1.8 vccpll 2.5 bclk 102.80- 102.93 bios L1.31 Win 10 enterprise 32bit ltsb Everty time i boot into os the multiplier self adjusts to 35 . I'm running out of ideas!!

Pm back

Title.

Issue fixed.