Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

GunGod

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GunGod

  1. For your last statement I’d probably go with a S3 Chrome 540 GTX or S3 Graphics 5400E x2 if the latter made it the wild. The 20, 400 & 500 series cards are non-existent on Ebay figured there would be a few floating around somewhere must of had a little HTPC market share.

     

    Are u sure u have it ?

     

    Edit:

    Can i suggest rule for stage 4 "At least 1% overclock of GPU" :D

  2. First i had same with Arock Extreme 4 and RMA the mobo, after testing with their CPU they replaced the mobo so i think its mobo isue but now i dont thinks so. The one that amaze me is why they replaced the mobo ? Is CPU damaged smthng in it ? BTW Asrock was the first mobo i put my 4960X and at the begining it work with NV cards at slot 1. The issue started when i changed cards. No high voltages no LN2, water cooled. :(

  3. Noticed that mine 4960X cant work with any Nvidia cards in first PCI-E slot x16. In second PCI-E x16 slot it works. Strange is that ATI cards work in both but at first runs at x8 not x16, if two cards are nstaled in slots x16 one and two first card runs at x8 and second at x16. This is with Rampage IV Black with latest bios. I tryed 4930K and all NV or ATI cards run normal. Any ideas why or its CPU itself ? Setting Gen 1 to 3 for slots dont help.

  4. It seems like you don't see a lot of points.

     

    If you're the rules-hero here you should know about this part:

     

     

    The submissions only have a different version which does not affect the final score so there is no reason at all to block them. Even if they are against the rules. Those competitions are for fun and there is absolutely no reason to disappoint so many people for no reason.

     

    No reason ?!? you showing me example with general rules when same rules says very simple that 1.0 is not alowed and you admit u never know this calling this minor mistake. So it looks like rules apply only for me and all ppl that follow em and not for you and other that dont that elaphant$hit!

  5. I just really dislike the fact that you reported the submissions few hours after the contest was over and I guess you did not just realise this at exactly this moment? Real sportsmanship would be to let guys know that there could be a mistake. Especially if there are a lot of results and you apparently went through every single top result and checked the version and reported it. My GTX 570 result (first setup with 3770K and therefor lower score) was uploaded on 2nd of November and I already used v1.0 there. That's a timeframe of almost two months....

    And now it turns out that the issue with v1.0 is multi GPU related and we did a single GPU benchmark. I don't even find words for that really.

     

    Nope i notice this just before copmpetition ends while i was trying improve my performance. If i noticed this early i should warn ya for sure. About top scores you are wrong again, our team wont have any benefits from this cuz we know more than 2 weeks ago that we will not have result with 3rd card (GTX 670) and stage is lost. I mention reason why futuremark make 1.1 not why 1.0 is not allowed on hwbot, after all rules are for all even if you not know them or i am wrong again ?

  6. Not urs. GunGod reported a ton of submissions including one of me and also dino. So it affected the ranking quite a lot. We have to discuss this first internally tho.

     

    Yep you are right it was just after i read this:

    http://www.futuremark.com/downloads/3DMark_Technical_Guide.pdf

    No hard feelings bro, look page 21 for details. Briefly 1.0 has issues exactly using multiple gpu's.

×
×
  • Create New...