-
Posts
3374 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by GENiEBEN
-
-
-
(although I fear that will happen anyway, probably more tweaks out there I don't know of)
Dont worry I dont participate But yes, there is another one.
-
Ho FYI, you can't validate anymore online with CPUZ 1.60.x
Wow, put out 3 bugged versions and block those that still work.
-
Pff points hole lol. Tried recalc and clickin on achievement, nothing works.
-
Lol Photoshop Skills minus 9000
-
Went to office quickly this morning to test the 1.61.2, it's even worse than others, it shows 5 MHz or 9.6 MHz bus frequency
Sent 16 cpuz report.txt files to CPUID
Just like on Win8.
-
Programmer logic....
-
Can't they just increase version numbering to 1.62 for the fixed one?
-
-Timings FIELD is wrong. Dont use '' : '' or '' ( ''.
-Also use 4096 instead of 4GB. Only digits w/o measure units.
-Rating FIELD is an integer, not '' DDR2 ''. As in 6400/8500 etc.
-
A screenshot of what exactly you're tryin to do will help us.
Are you trying to simply submit a score or did you entered an user-started challenge?
-
Guys from CPU-Z told me it has been fixed, version is still 1.61 (download link is the same) but there bug is not present
Cool, now let's archive the original bugged version
-
Have you used -f ?
-
Damn that was so obvious that I'm afraid I need glasses now. Thanks tanakax.
-
-
Is there any way to see which OS was used in cpuid links? I bet he keeps using Win8, where cpuz goes berzerk.
-
Did any of you guys actually rerun the benchmark? I tried it using myq7700, and I didn't get the boost in the same spot both times... rofl.
Always restart PC after a run.
-
Just tested this little trick - doesn't do much aside from boosting the score by 20pts here.
- default thread count: 1224.6
- all threads selected: 1231.7
- only 64 threads: 1245.5
Link to screen: http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content//Capture1.png
It's a legit tweak for the benchmark.
You're doing it wrong, but yeah legit.
The tweak consists in finding the threads that boost the score, not just selecting one like you did. I.e. I found best avg score is given by running in steps of 8 (1-2-3-4-8-16-24 etc), but like Mr.Scott said, it depends a lot on each cpu/platform.
-
Our team has been applying the UCBench tweaks for months (year?), and the submissions have never been contested. If you look around at submissions, many of them are using thread/instruction set tweaks that are just now coming under debate here..
The "Thread" tweak has been used since I've shown it after CC. The first "SSE3" only tweak was used during CC12 and I had to explain that one too. F.T.S.
This is a very old case. Carl used it a year ago: http://hwbot.org/submission/2197835_turrican_ucbench_2011_athlon_xp_1800_thoroughbred_60.9_mpt_score after he saw GENiEBEN using it.Yep Ney and Karl noticed quite quick But Karl EDITED the score so it's not APRIL 2011 but MAY.2012.
Whatever you guys decide, legal or not (PowerToy anyone?), I still have the 3rd tweak I haven't used yet, so I for one couldn't care anyway.
PS: Ohh and no one noticed the Unigine one so far What takes you guys so long? I can take LN2 records on air with this one, not so good imho.
-
Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.
Cmon just tell people to use PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT
-
Dayum, need to bench more cpus, got enough mobos it seems
Edit: Would be nice to see top HW Libraries
-
I wouldn't be surprised if there is a bug somewhere, it's totally anti-intuitive that 64 threads is faster than 2 on these CPUs, more threads to fight over the same resources. However, it's an easy thing to dettect, so IMO we could just allow it until it's proven to be a bug.
If I spill the beans app gets banned from hwbot
-
Looks like the ranking hasnt been updated
2 points. So close!
-
where is validation online?
408 is good for only 4230mhz!
Sorry but I don't upload validation files on ucbench site anymore.
My bag of tricks has some efficiency tricks
-
CPU-Z 1.61 is out! Bugs, feedbacks go in here
in Benchmark software
Posted · Edited by GENiEBEN
link fixed
Wait a second, what API are we talking about here? It's safe to assume no WMI is used, so all he has to do is retrieve a specific range from system memory (c/asm) and make use of it.
For those interested: http://wiki.osdev.org/Memory_Map_(x86)
Nvm https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B7LwI1tJ08joWkd4Ti1seUsySEE