Leeghoofd

Plz check out the submission rules at the frontpage, some of your submissions lack CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, your submissions lacks CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, some of your submissions lacked CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules I removed the incorrect ones

Plz check out the submission ruels at the frontpage, your submissions lack CPUZ tabs for CPU and memory https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Giving up is for pussies, Greeks are not quitters K it's a U CPU not a H, but it is still a 6 core.... look what happened if I pull this one from the compo... his 3100 score pops up...

only one 6 core will count , the 5600x outperforms the 5600H

@Doomed83 @Solid State Alchemy @Forks @TASOS @Mr.Scott @Cali_amr @Hilderman @Goku is Gei @exaberries @Hudson13 @Bavor K we tested the average fix on the UAT test server, it looks good, but we would request from you to submit also at the uat.hwbot.org ( remember it is slow ) for the Country Cup. this will allow to quickly find errors by your feedback. Take note that not all current scores are there, so if possible submit all the scores you subbed already at the standard HWBOT to the UAT one too plz (bewerkt) So Team USA we count on you! Other countries can also submit at https://uat.hwbot.org/ The sooner we can finish the testing, the sooner we can push this to production and leave another bug behind us...

euh the stage mentions : Use 4,6,8,12,16 processor core(s) in total. 5600X and the 5600H are both 6 cores.... so only one score will count, you need to submit with the other processor cores too For the average score it took your score into account: 81 seconds divided by 5 is 16 seconds something... If it was the Ultraex2005 score of 130 seconds it would be 26 seconds average...

yes The average score listed at the stage page is correct. The programmer is fixing the shown submissions that are part of this correct average score, as currently they are not properly listed if you click the average score in the stage ranking... Easiest thing for the teams to follow up is to make an excel and verify our average with yours... But keeping in mind if users submit multiple hardware scores that they can block other country members' scores...

Thanks for the picture, interesting PCIe riser, what brand is that ?

UL benchmarks is contacted about this score, keep you posted

A setup picture would be recommended to verify the cooling setup

you go gal

no worries removed from the compo sir

Your score got reported sir for missing screenshot, plz check out the rules and sample screenshot at: https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Your score got reported sir for missing screenshot, plz check out the rules and sample screenshot at: https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Your score got reported sir for missing screenshot, plz check out the rules and sample screenshot at: https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules

Plz check out the rules on how to submit at HWBOT ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ), even with BenchMate scores we require 2 X CPUZ tabs , one for CPU and one for Memory

Plz check out the rules on how to submit at HWBOT ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ), even with BenchMate scores we require 2 X CPUZ tabs , one for CPU and one for Memory

Plz check out the rules on how to submit at HWBOT ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ), even with BenchMate scores we require 2 X CPUZ tabs , one for CPU and one for Memory

Plz check out the rules on how to submit at HWBOT ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ), even with BenchMate scores we require 2 X CPUZ tabs , one for CPU and one for Memory

Plz check out the rules on how to submit at HWBOT ( https://hwbot.org/benchmarkRules ), even with BenchMate scores we require 2 X CPUZ tabs , one for CPU and one for Memory

Where's the screamshot muppet lol

yes its divided per CPU CORE (not processor cores), so a Vermeer, Renoir, Cezanne, ...

@_mat_ which benchmark ?