Leeghoofd

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

plz rebench and use the official wallpaper , thank you

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

- A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username. - I can't spot the maximum clocks in your hwinfo configuration

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

Missing: Geekbench 5 verification link A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username. HWinfo only 43 seconds for a full GeeK5 run ???

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

A CPUZ 2.01 or newer Validation link is required, registered on your HWBOT username.

yes, as long as you use a single card setup of the 500 series

Changed already last week lads: 400 SLi goes Unigine heaven extreme, 500 series 3Dmark11

yes one videocard only, so you can use one 590 and no , we stick to DDR2 platforms only

Yes R15 would have been a better pick, other lessons learned so far: - too much drama for the Bios rule; we are referring to the retail version number so we need to rephrase this rule in the future. HWBots intent was to prevent that for some competitions like G.Skill where the vendor released special biosses to allow higher e.G. IGPU voltages and such... user microcode modding we never considered. - Hardware sharing stays hard to prove, nevertheless appropriate video footage was provided; boot from Bios showing SP values till the end of the benching session. - Video footage delivery must be stricter, maximum of 2 days to allow some editing. - It saddens me how much nitpicking we have on miniscule details, while the score is fully legit, sportsmanship is hard to find. Either we go full retard and start even blocking submissions for stupid stuff like wrong setup picture etc... The choice is yours...

Stage 2 32M closed: Video footage required from @Rauf @FireKillerGR and @phil

Nice one, you nailed it

Could you plz provide some video footage of this or comparable SuperPi run to the moderation team plz

Preliminary Winner of the 3rd 12900K is @madness777 Can you plz provide some video footage of your geekbench run plz? Stage 2 winner @lukasb, first runner @Arni90 and @sugi0lover plz provide footage of the runs including your overclocked setup !

Nope , full throttle it is...