Christian Ney

I know you run it later and several times, but I imo for this kind of challenge the video must be the same as the screenshot. But as it's not written explicitly somewhere, I can't affirm nothing Maybe something to do with this sentence that I don't really understand EDIT: Day in video is 3/4/11 and same on the SS (aka 3/4/11). Time in video is 17:17 and 18:29 on the SS. If he ran superpi several times (because it crashed or had errors) then it fits perfectly

johnamd just PM me about the 1 Mhz change (Video showing 109.47 and SS : 110.47). I did a little investigation and found this: Not written anywhere but... According to this kind of challenge, I think the video and the SS have to be linked. I mean what we see on the video has to be on the screenshot ? Logic LeGaL^CriMeR's video is right according to the rules. But Super Pi Result was done separately (maybe the cpuz one too, but I have no proof). I mean it's not the same Super Pi run we see on the video. On the Video: Real Memory: 10366976 Available real memory: 1058623488 Allocated memory...... 1rst loop: 06.583s 2nd loop: 27.643s 3rd loop: 51.886s 4th loop:.... .... .... Screenshot: Real Memory: 1073741823 Available real memory: 1073741823 Allocated memory...... 1rst loop: 06.536s 2nd loop: 27.471s 3rd loop: 51.542s 4th loop:.... .... .... These are not the same values... regarding the cpuz 1 Mhz improvement, I think that's quite normal, I got some board that do MHz drop/increase and sometimes it's quite a lot, -/+ 3Mhz

jsuis pas sur que bob check tous les jours son profil sur le forum, envoi lui plutot un message privé

Good video

I am away 24/04 to 1/05. No Internet for 1 week. I hope I can still OC down there in Italy, I will bring my AGP 2x rig with me I know I will miss you guys

Project Top 100 Hardware Masters done

I need one

I just tried to... you know... remove the heatspreader to know the ICs I am just Super Talent

Is this a compliment ?

There is no way to know, every cpu has is overclocking potential, the batch means nothing

haha nice, I think one GT crashed on my side, I got only 87K Or it's the msi board

With the new drivers, the score is only improved by 6 pts I will update this one to show you

hehe, with this cpu you are killing the TOP10

Probleme with calculation ? I still haven't got the hardware rank after 1 hour

Impressive

you're welcome

Usually I report all, but I am sure I checked in the 3DMark99 and it wasn't... maybe you submited later. And when I report because of a wrong category like here, I ask the moderator to move the result so maybe it's already moved to Radeon 9250. And you have to do a recalc. Regarding the 9250 SE 3DMark 99 you can edit your submission yourself Clic the more button on your submissions: then clic the edit button: And don't gorget to recalc your best results to have your cups and points back: Step one : Go on your profile, and clic the option tab : Step two : Clic the ''force recalculation of best submissions'' button :

As alway your photos are awesome So beautiful

I don't know who reported the other results or if other results were reported, but the one I reported myself I wrote it was because of the 128/64 Bit. I think there is an e-mail notification or it's written on your profile when something is reported or you can check the option tab of the submission and then clic the ''submission history'' button

Your Radeon 9250 SE submissions are with a 128Bit card and the Radeon 9250 SE is with 64Bit I think you have to submite under the Radeon 9250 category and not the SE category

Making screenshots like the ones I provided here will solve your problems

hum wasn't my birthday

Zalman without fixations http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=99590&postcount=2

Allow the trick: Always under or equal @ the Real CPU Freq Disallow the trick: Always under or equal @ the Stock CPU Freq Everywhere we need the CPU Speed Detection details mandatory on the SS

Step one : Go on your profile, and clic the option tab : Step two : Clic the ''force recalculation of best submissions'' button : It will work