veblen

Starting out slow on mobile before moving back to desktop.

This would be a welcome addition to the bot.

'tis my move.

Nice work! Been busy with PCM05 I see.

Amazing!

Fantastic job, Nuke!

Please add the Quadro FX 370 LP (distinct from Quadro FX 370). Here's the GPU-Z validation: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/6sdpb/ Thanks!

EDIT: Ugh, just found out there is a support tickets thread - please move this there. I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but there isn't an entry for the Quadro 370 LP (8 CUDA cores) in the videocard database. http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_quadro_fx_370_lowprofile_us.html There is a Quadro 370 (16 CUDA cores) but it's a different card. Is it possible to add this? Have been benching everything I own and can't submit scores for this card (for what they are worth). It couldn't even complete Unigine DX9. Here's a 3DMark03 screenshot: Thanks!

Well, someone on OCN just managed to validate 5.83GHz (119x49 on a MSI X79-65-8D) on a 3930K under SS. http://www.overclock.net/t/1195318/msi-x79-65-8d-wr-cpuz-val-3930k-5831#post_16114840 That's a WR, no?

Way to go, buddy!

Thanks for the responses! @Honda: I've been trying to get both to 5GHz (167x30), mem at 1670MHz but so far, no luck at up to 1.55vcore/1.4vtt/1.86pll/1.28 qpi. I keep getting BCCode 135 which doesn't seem to turn up on searches so far. The best I've gotten is 4.93GHz and the A515T seems to require lower volts than the F729. I'm under water so I'm not sure how high I ought to push vcore. @Sam OCX: Thanks! I initially leaned towards the F batch, esp. given the performance of 3005F720. But I have the F729 which is less well-documented, and the single screenshot of 6.3GHz on the T is giving me pause. Will keep trying.

Hello all, I'm an enthusiast bencher with two 980Xs and am deciding which one to keep. The batch numbers are: 1. 3008A515T 2. 3005F729 I haven't been able to find much information about the first one (with the T at the end) save one submission here: http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=3705987&postcount=4835 I'm thinking of finally going sub-zero next year but as of now, I'm not sure how to find out which chip is the better clocker. Both chips can hit 4.25GHz (170x25) with mem at 1020MHz 9-11-9-27, QPI 3.6GHz with 1.3vcore. I'd greatly appreciate any help here from the expert benchers!

Isn't the RIVE awesome?

Wow! That's really organized; thanks for sharing. I'm going to start doing that. It's going to take a while for me though! I'll have to open every single screenshot across multiple drives and folders...that's how disorganized I am.

Grr, looks like I either need to get a phase change unit or finally make the jump to DICE or LN2. According to the reset/reboot test, my chip can probably do 55x, but I'm afraid of putting >1.6vcore through it under water. It's a psychological hurdle I have to overcome...